Bloomberg Tax Fixed Assets Reviews
Total 48 reviews
4.1
All reviews are from verified customers
Rating Distribution
5
Stars33%
4
Stars50%
3
Stars15%
2
Stars2%
1
Stars0%
Satisfaction score
Ease of use
8
Value for money
8
Customer Support
8
Functionality
8
Marcia
Not Specified, 500+ employees
More than a year
“BNA Fixed Assets
Pros
It's easy to use and making the process of generating reports uncomplicated. Its intuitive design allows me to create detailed reports quickly and efficiently, streamlining my workflow and saving valuable time.
Cons
The help index is confusing and hard for me to find answers.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
10
Value for money
10
Customer Support
9
Functionality
10
Rashid
Not Specified, N/A employees
Free Trial
“SR Accountant
Pros
I've had a good experience with the software. It was very easy to set up, add assets, and make changes mid-year. The reporting is great and can be easily modified. The only bad experience I've had was with customer service. I hoped they would be more understanding and guide us through issues, but instead, I was referred to the manual to figure it out myself.
Cons
I would like the reports with the headers and all fields as shown in the reporting feature to be Excel-ready. Otherwise, it is a good product.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
8
Value for money
8
Customer Support
3
Functionality
10
Dawn
Not Specified, N/A employees
Free Trial
“Farmers Bank of Appomattox
Pros
We've been BNA desktop customers for many years and recently converted to the BNA web product. The conversion wasn't as smooth as hoped, but we finally got up and running. The primary complaint so far is the microscopic font size in reports. We'll work with technical support to solve this issue, hopefully. So far, technical support has been very responsive and helpful.
Cons
Average. I expected an improvement with web vs. desktop. Consolidated reporting is very poor. We need consolidated reporting similar to the desktop for our Tax Accountants.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
8
Value for money
8
Customer Support
8
Functionality
8
Tara
Not Specified, 51-100 employees
More than a year
“BNA Fixed Assets Review
Pros
I like the ability to search within each field on the asset view.
Cons
Listed below are a few desired enhancements: Order of fields in Add Asset windows to be customizable; Add option to upload documents within the Add Asset window when an asset is created rather than editing the asset and then uploading the document; Option to add an additional asset after one is complete; Default within Add Asset windows: Override Additional First-Year Depreciation - Default next screen to choose No AFYD; Setup - Fields Asset Field List - larger box to view all data at once; Similar: Edit within asset - when selecting from PickList - larger selection area; Have All Favorites (reports and batches) as a filter in the reports section; Asset Viewer - ability to go to next asset without exiting asset viewer; Assets View - add more headers and be able to scroll over (left and right).
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
8
Value for money
6
Customer Support
8
Functionality
5
Stephen
Wholesale, 500+ employees
More than a year
“Average Product!
Pros
The software allows me to have multiple companies open simultaneously. This feature is incredibly convenient, as it lets me switch between different companies effortlessly. It enhances my productivity by enabling me to manage and compare data from various entities without needing to close and reopen files constantly.
Cons
Effective consolidated reporting helps streamline data analysis and improve the accuracy of financial and operational insights.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
6
Value for money
6
Customer Support
6
Functionality
6
Yardley
Pharmaceuticals, 500+ employees
More than a year
“Novo Nordisk Inc BNA Fixed Assets Review
Pros
It's easy to train new, non-tax technical personnel.
Cons
The way that the reports export to Excel.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
5
Value for money
8
Customer Support
10
Functionality
8
Greg
Hospitality, 500+ employees
More than a year
“Very Easy to use; good service, expensive pricing model; weak reporting
Pros
The asset type method simplifies training for users.
Cons
The pricing structure is disadvantageous for companies with numerous assets but infrequent transactions. The basic reporting is often inaccurate. An upgrade is necessary for better reporting capabilities.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
10
Value for money
5
Customer Support
8
Functionality
5
Greg
Hospitality, 500+ employees
More than a year
“Very Easy to use; good service, expensive pricing model; weak reporting
Pros
The asset type method simplifies the training process for new users significantly. By categorizing assets in a clear and organized way, it helps new users understand and navigate the system quickly. This method ensures that training is efficient and that users can become proficient in managing assets in a short amount of time.
Cons
The price model is unfair to companies with a large number of assets but few transactions. The reporting is basic and prone to error. An upgrade is required to get good reporting capability.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
10
Value for money
6
Customer Support
8
Functionality
6