QEval Reviews
Total 11 reviews
3.5
All reviews are from verified customers
Rating Distribution
5
Stars18%
4
Stars36%
3
Stars27%
2
Stars9%
1
Stars9%
Satisfaction score
Ease of use
7
Value for money
7
Customer Support
7
Functionality
6
Telecommunications, 500+ employees
More than a year
“Helpful playback controls”
Pros
The playback speed controls are really useful and I appreciate the visual markers tied to subject headings because they make it easier to follow the different parts of a conversation. The bar graphs showing conversation volume are also a nice touch since they clearly show when there's silence and when there's active audio.
Cons
One thing that doesn't work as well is the limited character count in the agent comment field. It makes it harder for agents to fully explain their side or properly dispute something when they need more space.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
8
Value for money
9
Customer Support
9
Functionality
9
Education Management, 500+ employees
More than a year
“Solid reporting”
Pros
Getting around it is simple, the reporting works well and the data is presented clearly.
Cons
I'd still like to see more reporting options added, along with AI features that are more affordable.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
8
Value for money
7
Customer Support
7
Functionality
9
Outsourcing/ Offshoring, 500+ employees
More than a year
“reporting is the worst part”
Pros
call recording helps keep past calls saved for future reference.
Cons
aside from call recording almost everything else about it has been disappointing. reporting is especially bad, the worst I've come across. exporting reports to Excel also needs to be improved so the data comes out in a proper table instead of linked worksheets.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
2
Value for money
1
Customer Support
3
Functionality
1
Public Safety, 500+ employees
Less than a year
“Lets agents monitor their progress”
Pros
It gave me a clear view of where agents needed coaching. I was also able to share a guide with target keywords so they could monitor their own progress.
Cons
Some calls were transcribed incorrectly which caused frustration when agents knew they had mentioned the right markers but still got scored lower because of it.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
10
Value for money
9
Customer Support
9
Functionality
10
Farming, 11-50 employees
Less than a year
“Superb for agent monitoring”
Pros
Every day, I rely on it to keep track of my agents and it's very simple to navigate. It also does a really good job of helping my agents better understand their calls.
Cons
Everything has been excellent and I honestly don't feel like anything needs to be changed.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
10
Value for money
9
Customer Support
10
Functionality
10
Information Technology and Services, 51-100 employees
Less than a year
“Poor reporting”
Pros
It gives us a baseline to work from and helps start conversations around phone hygiene. That ends up creating coaching opportunities and helps us improve the customer experience.
Cons
The reporting side is really bad. I eventually stopped reporting unfair low scores because nothing ever got corrected. Some of those grades are completely unreasonable and make my team look worse than it should.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
7
Value for money
6
Customer Support
5
Functionality
3
Telecommunications, 500+ employees
Less than 6 months
“Missing key investigation tools”
Pros
It's useful for parsing calls, reviewing performance and scoring teams.
Cons
Investigation side feels pretty limited. There are no scrubbing controls to fast-forward or rewind, no visual timeline to show where interactions happen versus silence and no transcript. It also lacks bookmarks, whether automatic or manual, to mark strong or weak moments in a call. On top of that, there's no way to clip and export audio for training, compare agents at specific parsed parts of a call or highlight keywords.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
3
Value for money
5
Customer Support
4
Functionality
2
Consumer Services, 101-500 employees
Less than a year
“all evaluations in one place”
Pros
Accessing all my evaluations is very convenient and simple.
Cons
Would love to see more graphics added since that would make it even better for all supervisors.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
9
Value for money
7
Customer Support
9
Functionality
9
Computer Software, 51-100 employees
Less than a year
“clean but very basic”
Pros
The app keeps things wonderfully simple which is honestly one of its best qualities.
Cons
It isn't packed with features though. It's pretty basic but it still gets the job done.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
7
Value for money
6
Customer Support
6
Functionality
5
Telecommunications, 500+ employees
Less than 6 months
“Powerful Qa toolkit”
Pros
Running QA on a project with it really requires someone who knows how to explore the platform well. It includes pretty much everything needed but you have to dig around a bit to locate all the features.
Cons
The calibration section isn't working properly and the training videos there don't play either.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
8
Value for money
7
Customer Support
7
Functionality
7
Telecommunications, 500+ employees
Less than a year
“Limited reporting”
Pros
It can record calls and score them from the call queues set up by the admin.
Cons
There's basically no practical user configuration option to improve call monitoring accuracy and the reporting feature feels rigid and limited.
Rating Distribution
Ease of use
7
Value for money
7
Customer Support
6
Functionality
3