Codal Reviews

“Codal is a FRAUD Company

Pros

Codal is a FRAUD company. They maintain an awesome presence at internet boasting about big clients, but we are their FIRSTHAND victim. We have been fighting for justice since last 8 years. But to no avail. Codal's CEO Keval Baxi and COO Matthew Gierut are dishonest people. In 2017, we gave them a contract to develop a software platform for us. And we gave them huge money for this. But even after 8 years (as of May 2025), we are still waiting that product. They simply ran away with our money and abandoned us.

Cons

Codal does NOT have technical competence. The project (software product to be built) was designed to be completed in 6 months, but even after one year, Keval Baxi and Matthew Gierut of Codal kept making one excuse or another. And finally when they gave us the access to test the software, hell broke loose. The product was FULL OF BUGS as if made by a untrained coder from some cave area. Please google SameCondition Versus Codal and you will find a lot of information about our court case and how we have been fighting for our rights. We took Codal to court in Chicago for "Breach of Contract, FRAUD and unjust enrichment".

“Chaotic experience

Pros

They proved to be unfit to manage the engagement.

Cons

Some misleading statement

“Never questioned the amount of money they charge

Pros

The app was accepted into the app store on time and within budget

Cons

They should enhance their awareness

“All-rounders!

Pros

The project team took feedback well and implemented it

Cons

Nope

“Endless participation

Pros

Their fluid, collaborative communication helped the project progress smoothly

Cons

Could improve in terms of communication

“All we could ask from a company

Pros

Their impressive service resulted in a positive recommendation

Cons

Couldnt find any

“Services are good

Pros

The website looked fantastic and earned compliments from visitors

Cons

A lot of delays

“Intellectuals

Pros

Its easy to navigate, and the payment gateway development is on track

Cons

None

“They didnt care about the cost

Pros

Their skillsets are varied, and they’ve been able to tackle challenges

Cons

Some room for improvements

“Ease of work

Pros

They are easy to communicate and collaborate with

Cons

The more homework a client does on what theyre looking for upfront, the better

“Stood out!

Pros

The team exercised excellent communication and transparent transactions

Cons

Quick to grasp

“Delivered what we agreed upon

Pros

Codal did a great job, the code was in itself a living proof of it

Cons

Time management issues

“Dream it. They will make it!

Pros

The team was diligent and were able to resolve issues immediately

Cons

Not their thing

“Their experience meant alot

Pros

They provided regular updates for the client, which was a comfort

Cons

Not for large corporations

“Alphas!!!

Pros

They produced quality development with quick turnaround time

Cons

None

“Primary go-to team

Pros

Their initiative, speed, and focus were outstanding

Cons

Budget friendly

“Greatest asset

Pros

Their thorough process of gathering requirements and implementing them as specified, along with how they convey the impact of the work helps them stand out

Cons

Nil

“Great addition

Pros

They responded quickly to any inquiries

Cons

The project management was phenomenal

“Bring speed to the work

Pros

They managed to collaborate effectively with a dispersed team

Cons

The whole experience was professional

“They act like team members

Pros

They provided a project leader who was hands-on and communicative throughout the project

Cons

No room for improvement