Canditech Reviews

“User-friendly app features

Pros

I love this app as its easy-to-use, has great features and questions.

Cons

My main concern is candidates may copy the exam.

“automated assessment & testing

Pros

Using this tool, we've managed to close our open data professional roles quicker than ever before. By uploading our own assessments onto their system, we're able to automatically test essential abilities such as SQL, Python and domain knowledge. That automation cuts down on time spent manually grading tests and running unnecessary interviews and it still delivers a smooth, high-quality experience for candidates.

Cons

Honestly, I can't think of many downsides to mention.

“Effective assessment suite

Pros

I've found the assessment suite and its testing platform very effective for narrowing down candidates during interview cycles. The people behind it are incredibly responsive, they frequently roll out product updates within days of my feedback which is refreshing compared with other services where suggestions seem to vanish into a black hole.

Cons

At the moment, nothing specific comes to mind that I think needs improving.

“Simple, customizable testing

Pros

Using this tool, I've found putting together tests unbelievably convenient for both non-technical people and those with a tech background. You can pick from ready-made assessments tailored to lots of roles or build a test entirely from scratch yourself. Now assessing candidates happens so much faster and I consistently see better-quality results!

Cons

Would love the option to spice up my tests more and tailor them to match my brand, I'd like richer customization, like adding brand colors, logos and tone so everything feels cohesive and on-brand when candidates take the assessment.

“Global recruitment at scale

Pros

We relied on this platform to recruit staff at scale across multiple countries. Because many candidates are located abroad, we used the built-in language proficiency tests and asked for video responses to gauge their language abilities early on in the hiring funnel. Since the Account Manager position involves direct client interaction, strong English and other language skills are essential. To cover the technical side as well, we paired the platform's language assessments with our own custom tasks that evaluated candidates' role-specific technical competencies thoroughly.

Cons

Because we used the tool to evaluate language abilities in several languages beyond English, I wish it had included integrated translation features to make that process smoother. In practice, we translated our assessments into the target languages ourselves, or we relied on video-response prompts that let candidates reply in their native languages which worked well enough but required extra effort on our end.

“expert led test creation

Pros

The platform includes an Experts service where I can upload our tests or sit down with specialists to discuss them. Before finding this product we relied on internal test creation, so it's been really helpful to simply and quickly send the materials, have the tests constructed directly in our account and get actionable suggestions on ways I can enhance and refine those assessments.

Cons

Exporting candidate test outcomes would be helpful and I was informed the feature is already planned on the product roadmap for future availability.

“Realistic role based evaluations

Pros

In my previous role I used this tool to recruit product managers. At that company the PMs collaborated across a wide range of teams, R&D, customer success and marketing, so we had to confirm they possessed strong time-management, communication and prioritization abilities, along with great knowledge of the development lifecycle and product marketing. Using this platform, I was able to design assessments that realistically recreated those overlapping day-to-day responsibilities and team interactions which helped us evaluate candidates across the different intersections of the real job.

Cons

Diagram creation feels limited without a built-in drawing tool. I had to rely on candidates uploading sketches they made elsewhere, which added an extra step to the process

“Efficient multi-skill assessment

Pros

As the EMEA Compensation and Benefits Manager, I've come to rely on this platform as a key asset for making our recruitment more efficient and for helping us secure top talent for the team. One feature I really value is the extensive assortment of question formats included in the job-simulation tests. These assessments span everything from coding and SQL to interpersonal competencies such as communication and presentation. Because of this breadth, it's feasible to assess applicants across numerous skill areas and form a rounded understanding of their capabilities. Something else I find particularly helpful is the platform's accessibility, it's very user-friendly. Navigating the system is convenient and the tests themselves feel feasible and well designed. That simplicity means organizations can incorporate this tool into their hiring workflows without investing excessive time in training or onboarding staff members. In my experience it speeds up decision-making and reduces administrative overhead during recruiting cycles significantly.

Cons

No issues have appeared so far and I continue using the platform smoothly in daily workflows.

“Comprehensive candidate evaluation

Pros

This platform has honestly transformed how I recruit because it lets me evaluate candidates on both technical abilities and interpersonal strengths. I really like being able to mix different exam formats, especially the coding and SQL challenges, and combine those with personality and cultural-fit assessments. Doing that gives me a much clearer sense of whether someone will mesh with our workplace. In practice, it works. So far, every person I've brought on using this system has been an excellent match. If your team has been struggling to identify the right hires, I would strongly advise giving this tool a try.

Cons

The functionality meets my needs well and right now, it has everything I need to do my job effectively

“incredibly useful for evaluating writers

Pros

it is incredibly useful for evaluating our content writer's written and spoken communication. We set up a scenario-based assessment that guides applicants through multiple writing exercises. Previously, we were just emailing those prompts, so having a single platform to manage candidates and keep records has been a major improvement for both applicants and our team's organization.

Cons

Satisfaction remains high with the feature set and I feel it aligns perfectly with what our team was seeking.

“Social media hiring made simple

Pros

I've been relying on this platform to help us recruit social media managers and so far it's made a very strong impression on me. Because our social media hires must be well-versed across multiple platforms and capable of interpreting analytics and insights to shape our approach, this solution has turned out to be particularly valuable for assessing those technical abilities. We also make good use of the video response questions to gauge how candidates articulate ideas and interact, since the position requires a lot of teamwork and client-facing communication. It's crucial to me that our social media managers can communicate clearly with both colleagues and customers and overall, I'm really pleased with the results.

Cons

No major drawbacks, I enjoy strong collaboration with the responsive and supportive staff whenever I need help.

“aligned HR agency recruiting

Pros

Working at an HR agency, we are always on the lookout for creative ways to align our hiring workflows and deliver top-tier candidates to our clients. This platform has become a truly valuable ally for us in that effort, enabling us to cut costs and boost our earnings by offering greater value to the companies we serve and the people they hire.

Cons

Overall performance feels impressive and I appreciate the excellent platform experience alongside a fantastic support team.

“Outstanding onboarding & integration

Pros

Outstanding onboarding experience!! Our team owned a large set of tests that had been mostly delivered to candidates through Google Forms, so we sent all of those to the tool's team, who rebuilt them inside our account and even made substantial enhancements. On top of that, they applied our company branding and assisted with integrating our ATS.

Cons

Survey flexibility required adjustments after switching tools and I replicated grid-style questions using multiple-choice formats to maintain similar functionality.

“Efficient candidate scoring

Pros

My team and I find the thumbs-up/thumbs-down scoring for candidate tests incredibly useful and it saves us a ton of time. When I spot the hiring manager's thumbs-up on a test and read their notes, I'm able to move that person forward rapidly without having to hold an internal meeting or go through a lengthy back-and-forth.

Cons

Workflow automation could improve further and I would like the thumbs-up action to automatically move candidates to the next hiring stage.

“No code coding tests that saved me time

Pros

I don't have to be a developer to put together coding tests using this platform which I find really impressive. When I was interviewing for full-stack roles, the recruiter I worked with leaned on this tool's ready-made coding problems and then tailored them to fit our company's needs. That saved me a huge amount of time creating assessments myself and it gave me confidence that the evaluations were fair and reliable.

Cons

Platform reliability stands out positively and I struggle to identify downsides while I value the supportive team behind it.

“Csm hiring with tech focus

Pros

Our customer success positions involve a significant technical component because we deal directly with technically oriented clients. When hiring, we look for people who combine traditional CSM strengths with great data analysis or technical capabilities, even candidates who have transitioned from data analyst roles. For applicants coming from technical but non-client-facing backgrounds, we pay particular attention to their communication and interpersonal abilities. Conversely, when someone has strong client-facing experience but less technical depth, we focus on validating their technical competence during interviews.

Cons

Grading workflows feel slightly manual and I wish the rubric could be embedded directly in test reports while I currently copy and paste scores into comments.

“Video based insightful evaluations

Pros

Communication and the ability to convey reasoning are huge parts of working as a product manager and I rely on those skills daily. Before this tool was part of our process, my team and I were burning through endless hours coordinating interviews, trying to find times, bringing different teammates together to meet each applicant and dealing with all the back-and-forth. After we started creating video response questions on the platform, I could prompt candidates to explain a recent project they led or simply tell us about themselves which revealed a lot about their thought process. Every person on the hiring team could then watch those responses on their own schedule which saved time, reduced logistical headaches and gave us much richer insights into each candidate.

Cons

Customization capabilities remain impressive and I appreciate how the team implemented requested tweaks that made the tool feel tailored to our needs.

“comprehensive financial analyst testing

Pros

We've been using this platform for our financial analyst assessments and are really pleased with it. It's allowed us to put together a comprehensive, well-balanced exam with many different question formats, whereas before we were mostly limited to testing basic knowledge through Google Forms multiple-choice items. Now we blend knowledge-based multiple choice with realistic on-the-job Excel tasks for data analysis and recorded video answers that reveal candidates' spoken communication. We're also thrilled that we could produce two versions of the same assessment, one in English and one in Hebrew. Overall, it's given us a much richer way to evaluate technical skills, problem-solving and communication than our old setup did.

Cons

User experience continues to be strong overall and I find the platform thorough and easy to navigate without notable complaints.

“Realistic marketing role assessments

Pros

For hiring our paid acquisition manager roles, I've found this tool to be an absolutely fantastic resource. It lets me evaluate candidates across all the different aspects of the job, from budgeting and hands-on data analysis using Excel or Google Sheets to judging their creative instincts and overall marketing savvy. The assessments feel like a true on-the-job simulation, candidates work through real ad performance data and finish exercises that mirror the actual day-to-day responsibilities they would have in the role.

Cons

It's not really a negative but I have to log back in quite often. The team told me that the frequent re-login is for security reasons.

“Timesaving resume screening

Pros

I had no idea how many hours my team was losing sifting through stacks of CVs before we started using this tool. At our fast-growing startup we were overwhelmed by hundreds of applicants for every single open role and it became virtually impossible to examine each resume carefully. These days we require every candidate to complete this tool's assessment as the very first step in our hiring workflow and I rely on that objective data to choose who comes in for interviews.

Cons

I'd love for the platform to handle the entire hiring lifecycle for me, from receiving applications through to the final hiring decision.

“fantastic candidate experience

Pros

As a marketing professional, I know how vital it is to highlight our company culture to candidates just as we do for customers. We put significant emphasis on employer branding and the candidate experience which made this platform an easy choice. The test intro page presented to candidates looks fantastic and lets me add our logo, background media, a "join us" video and other assets. The interface genuinely feels like an extension of our careers page and helps us effectively market the company to prospective talent. The assessments we design deliver a smooth, engaging and realistic experience for our marketing applicants. I'm very happy with the results.

Cons

honestly can't think of anything negative to say, it's an exceptionally well-built website for my team!

“Simple, easy test creation

Pros

Putting together the tests was incredibly simple and clear-cut, I didn't need any formal training to get the hang of the tool. I just experimented with the platform and honestly enjoyed creating the assessments. I leaned on the pre-built tests for ideas when designing my own. Overall the interface feels tidy, well-organised and very easy for me to use.

Cons

tests are structured as separately timed sections, so once a candidate finishes and submits one section and moves on to the next, they can't return to the prior section. If I want candidates to see and work through the whole assessment freely, I have to combine everything into a single large section rather than relying on the default segmented timing.

“Early-funnel assessment efficiency

Pros

We used to run a really inefficient hiring process before this tool came along. Every open role forced us into an initial phone screening, then an HR interview and a follow-up interview with at least two hiring managers, plus other steps. Once we put assessments earlier in the funnel, we reclaimed a huge amount of time that had been wasted on interviews that weren't necessary.

Cons

I think the library of tests they offer is very strong but we still found gaps for a few specific roles and ended up building custom assessments from scratch to cover them. Thankfully their test builder is well-designed, so putting those bespoke tests together was fairly easy and convenient.

“Rapid coding test deployment

Pros

This tool made our fast-paced hiring process so much easier. Over one weekend I had our team send a backend coding test to 50 applicants and by the following week we were already interviewing the top five. Because the platform auto-scores the coding tasks, I can instantly identify which candidates demonstrate the strongest abilities.

Cons

We wanted the system to automatically send rejection emails to applicants who performed poorly on the assessments but that capability wasn't part of the plan we purchased.

“Flexible developer hiring platform

Pros

I discovered this was the first platform I could rely on that worked equally well for experienced developers and those just starting out. For junior applicants I set up coding challenges and video exercises, while the more senior candidates went through a realistic job simulation including hands-on code review, architecture and design tasks and a convenient coding assignment. I'd highly recommend it and be sure to reach out to the support team, their advice was extremely helpful.

Cons

One limitation I noticed is that although you can author tests in any programming language, the platform's user interface and experience are available only in English at the moment.

“pre-built data analyst tests

Pros

Back when I worked at my previous company I relied on this tool regularly. The platform came with an excellent ready-made product/data analyst assessment that saved us a ton of setup time. All it took was plugging in our company details and tweaking the scenario slightly and by the end of our first day with the service we were already sending it out to candidates. The blend of data-analysis problems, marketing exercises and checks for general skills gave me and the team the confidence to make faster, more assured hiring choices.

Cons

Our product manager position included some UI/UX duties and I noticed this tool didn't offer a specific test to evaluate those skills. Rather than a built-in assessment, we had to ask applicants to upload a design portfolio or a single project file for review which felt like a workaround instead of a structured evaluation.

“Holistic candidate evaluation

Pros

Previously we used a platform that focused solely on evaluating our R&D candidates' coding and technical abilities, which clearly matters but it never gave us a complete picture of who the person behind the resume was. There's a lot more to uncover about each applicant, how well they communicate, how they prioritize tasks, their level of English and even their motivation and personality to judge cultural fit. This tool elevated our assessments significantly and I feel like our candidates notice and value that we're making an effort to understand them so thoroughly now.

Cons

We specifically asked for pair-programming test capability to be added to this tool. From what I've been told, that functionality should roll out within the next few months and we're genuinely looking forward to trying it out when it becomes available.

“Highly customizable assessments

Pros

I was genuinely impressed by how customizable this tool is. My team and I developed a wide range of tests to evaluate candidates for our client company. Whatever we imagined for building these pre-employment assessments could be implemented, from conventional multiple-choice items to measure language ability, to gamified, realistic simulations that recreated client interactions using video prompts and open-text responses. That level of flexibility let us examine our client's candidates' full skill sets in whatever format we needed. The team also went above and beyond to help design and deliver those custom assessments.

Cons

One thing I wanted was an integrated feature to transcribe candidates' video responses into text. We ultimately worked around it using an external solution and the vendor has told us that transcription is on their roadmap.

“operations role simulation

Pros

Operations roles differ a lot between companies and can look completely different from industry to industry. With this tool, we were able to build a highly believable "day-in-the-life" scenario for an operations manager at our company. We make heavy use of the various question formats it offers to mimic actual responsibilities, embedding Google Sheets to have candidates create budgets, open-text prompts to simulate composing emails and video response tasks that stand in for Zoom-style conversations. On top of that, their ready-made sections, which we use to assess things like English proficiency, mesh well with our custom items and help us assemble what feels like an ideal, tailored test.

Cons

We've been extremely satisfied with the platform overall. It would have been nice if they offered a completely premade Operations Manager test out of the box but realistically no vendor is going to have a turnkey exam that matches our unique needs exactly, so we've managed fine by customizing what they provide.

“Ready-to-use entry-level assessments

Pros

We're using this platform to evaluate entry-level gaming roles such as Marketing, Monetization QA and similar positions. As a small, rapidly growing startup, we previously had no structured way to test candidates for these kinds of jobs. This solution came with fully prepared, 100% ready-to-use assessments that we could quickly tailor to include our own company-specific scenarios. The outcome was an enjoyable, engaging and genuinely realistic simulation of the everyday tasks our applicants would find on the job.

Cons

The assessment library is strong overall but I would really appreciate seeing more plug-and-play tests specifically geared toward game designers.

“multi-tech hiring support

Pros

We hire across multiple teams that use very different tech stacks and this tool handled every one of them because it supports a wide range of programming languages, even VBA. For the rarer languages we use, like Elixir in some projects, it still came up with several test suggestions that proved surprisingly effective in real-world scenarios.

Cons

not a con but there are still a handful of programming languages the tool doesn't cover yet, although they aren't the ones we rely on most, and the platform did offer some useful workarounds for those gaps. Their account managers and the Experts team have also been extremely supportive throughout.

“Reduced hiring risk with assessments

Pros

Looking back, we made a few bad hiring calls that ended up costing our company a significant amount of time and money. Bad hires hurt every organization but for an operation of our scale a wrong hire can have particularly severe consequences. This platform has given us real assurance that we're selecting the right candidates. Because the assessments we design mirror the actual tasks of the position, I can predict precisely how someone will perform on the job and feel certain they're the correct match.

Cons

I admit the upfront price was somewhat steep at first but you truly get what you pay for, this purchase has proven to be an excellent investment in building our future team and we have been very pleased with the results.

“confident hiring through candidate evaluation

Pros

This platform has made me much more confident when choosing hires. I've found that previous roles or a CV don't necessarily reflect how someone performs with clients. Seeing candidates deliver sales pitches on camera or compose client emails has eliminated a huge amount of pointless interview time, and saved our team from pouring resources into poor hires.

Cons

We liked the entire experience, to be honest. It did take a short while to dial in score benchmarks we felt comfortable trusting but with assistance from the tool's team we sorted that out pretty quickly.

“aligned hiring workflow and decisions

Pros

I've found this tool greatly aligns our hiring workflow and gives us much more confidence when deciding who to interview and hire. When candidates demonstrate real skills on the screening tests, it becomes clear that the people we pick for interviews are genuinely the strongest fits and we've noticed that test results strongly align with how those hires perform once they're onboarded. This has helped reduce guesswork and sped up our decision-making without sacrificing quality.

Cons

While the tests are incredibly useful for screening and assessing skills, we still have to schedule a call with every candidate to walk them through the test and explain our complete hiring process which does consume a fair amount of time. However, we've accepted this extra step as necessary to make sure candidates understand expectations and to maintain consistency across the process.

“Personalized video interview insights

Pros

We tried adding a personal layer by uploading clips of our hiring managers saying hello and posing interview questions for candidates to respond to on video which let us customize the experience. Doing that allowed us to learn about applicants before any live interviews began and the reactions and feedback we received were excellent.

Cons

I didn't find the feature for uploading videos of hiring managers asking candidates questions very feasible inside the test builder, so we ended up reaching out to the tool's support team to set it up. They responded quickly and guided us through it which was really helpful.

“Realistic client manager assessments

Pros

In my client relationship manager position I handled a blend of sales duties, relationship-building responsibilities, data analysis tasks and a variety of other activities. We collaborated with the tool's team to design an assessment that let us measure each of those different aspects of the job. The feature I liked most was giving candidates access to realistic datasets so they could produce reports and upload their project files straight into the assessment. After completing the task candidates also record a video walking through their reports which helped us see how they reason. We were able to quickly identify highly capable candidates for this position who are doing well.

Cons

Honestly I can't think of any drawbacks with this platform. We managed to build an ideal assessment, largely using items from their question bank and the team helped us tweak everything to meet our specific requirements. I would absolutely recommend this solution to others without hesitation.

“Comprehensive Salesforce developer testing

Pros

I came across this tool and it turned out to be one of the few platforms that let me quickly assemble a comprehensive, end-to-end test for Salesforce developers. The built-in sections covered all the core areas you'd expect to evaluate for Salesforce knowledge and we had the flexibility to insert our own specific topics and scenarios we wanted to judge. Being able to assess candidates' general Salesforce understanding while also having them write Apex code directly within the test hit the sweet spot for us and ultimately helped us identify higher-quality candidates much more efficiently.

Cons

It didn't have native Salesforce integration which was a drawback but we worked around it by attaching screenshots and instructing candidates to either type their code into the test manually or upload their coding projects.

“Job-simulated data candidate evaluations

Pros

Honestly, this tool made it fast for me to build assessments for our data candidates that closely resemble the real job, I could test SQL proficiency, Python coding and how they handle complex Excel-based databases. Paired with video prompts that let us see how candidates 'pitch' their findings and extract business insights, the exams we assembled transformed our hiring process. My team and I cut out a huge number of pointless interviews and overall it was a total game changer for saving time and improving candidate evaluation.

Cons

great tool, I don't have any particular suggestions for how the platform could be improved at this time.

“Automated Excel-based candidate testing

Pros

Our data analysts work with a huge number of Excel spreadsheets every day. Before we adopted this tool, using comparable Excel-based exercises to evaluate candidates meant I had to spend an enormous amount of time manually verifying every part of their spreadsheets. On top of that, the test files would remain in the candidates' possession and could expose our internal data. Since introducing this solution, we can automatically validate every cell in the spreadsheet and after a candidate submits their test they no longer have access to the file.

Cons

Don't have any complaints right now. I'm very pleased with the system.

“Scalable early career assessments

Pros

For early-career hiring I consider skills tests indispensable. Each year our team handles large-scale graduate recruitment and this platform lets us kick off screening with far more applicants while pushing assessments out rapidly and at scale. The timed tests give graduates a fair chance to demonstrate what they can do and within just a few days we can shortlist our top ten interviewees. As a result, we managed to hire four graduates within two weeks.

Cons

No complaints, the platform proved extremely useful for our hiring process and made everything much smoother.

“Focused hiring with job simulations

Pros

We were really struggling to find properly qualified candidates for our open roles before we started using this tool. In marketing, where people come from a wide array of career paths, counting on resumes alone to decide who to interview was often misleading and impractical. By building realistic job simulations inside the platform, we've been able to downplay resumes and instead concentrate on each candidate's actual potential to perform the job, which has made our hiring decisions much more focused and practical.

Cons

nothing negative to point out, it's working well for us at the moment.

“Multi-role hiring in one platform

Pros

As a member of a fast-moving startup, we're hiring across every function and I was worried we'd end up juggling one assessment tool for our R&D roles and another for everything else. When we found this platform, I really appreciated how many different roles it supports, allowing us to evaluate candidates across engineering, data and other teams all in one place. That gives me real confidence that we're making the right choices about who to bring onto the team which is hugely important for those early hires. They also offered pricing plans that actually work for a small company like ours which made adopting the tool a lot easier.

Cons

The only gap I found was that they didn't offer built-in tests for our product designers but we were able to devise a workaround to assess them effectively.

“Live coding and candidate insights

Pros

I'm really impressed with the data we get from candidates' test sessions, it's incredibly detailed and useful. I can actually follow them writing their code live which feels like I'm sitting right beside them during the test. The way scoring works is clever and highly adjustable to our needs. The library of tests makes it convenient for me to tailor and construct interviews that match my company's specific requirements. Using this platform saves me a tremendous amount of time because I end up interviewing only the strongest applicants. I trust it completely!

Cons

I don't have any complaints, I genuinely enjoy working with this platform and use it often.

“Automated campaign data assessments

Pros

In our marketing roles we handle extensive campaign optimization and dig into lots of data. We rely on this tool's built-in Google Sheets tasks to give candidates concrete datasets they can analyze and manipulate right inside the assessment environment. Every cell in those spreadsheets gets automatically validated and scored for us and that automation has saved a huge amount of time, especially because we used to hand-check each candidate's responses.

Cons

For our hiring process the platform worked really well. I couldn't find any features or tools that I needed but were missing, so it covered everything I expected and didn't leave any gaps for our recruiting workflow.

“Highly customizable project tasks

Pros

Everything about this tool is incredibly easy to customize. We rely on it for our home projects that mirror the work we do on our team, these aren't just coding-challenge style tasks but multi-day or multi-hour assignments (you can also remove time limits).

Cons

I'd really appreciate it if the coding questions offered support for Ruby as one of the languages.

“Ready-made tests for startups

Pros

As the founder of a startup, Canditch proved extremely useful when we kicked off our first hiring efforts. I lacked the expertise and resources to design pre-employment assessments for fields I wasn't familiar with, like R&D and marketing positions which were our first focus. The ready-made test materials I got from this platform were simple to adapt to our product and company culture and they saved me a significant amount of time I otherwise would have spent building tests from scratch on my own operations.

Cons

No issues to report, this tool genuinely helped me get unstuck in a part of the business where I felt completely lost.

“Efficient early-phase hiring workflow

Pros

When you're launching a new company, the early phase gets insanely busy. Between 10,001 daily tasks, it's nearly impossible to find the time and resources to properly vet and assemble the core team. We found that incorporating this tool into our hiring workflow saved us an enormous amount of time, it let us leverage ready-made assessments, distribute those tests en masse to candidates and then return structured results that made it convenient for us to decide who deserved to advance. Honestly, without this platform we would've struggled to move as quickly, it became a crucial part of how we evaluated and picked our initial hires.

Cons

Don't have any complaints so far, we're genuinely happy with it.

“Candidate report and scoring ease

Pros

We absolutely love the candidate test report page, it makes it so convenient for our team to check each candidate's assessment scores and then quickly give a thumbs-up or thumbs-down when deciding whether to progress them. On top of that, it's extremely easy for our hiring managers to jot down and submit their comments on the candidates' tests.

Cons

I had hoped we'd be able to message candidates through WhatsApp right from within the platform but currently that capability doesn't exist in this tool which is a limitation for our workflow.

“Built-in Google Sheets automation

Pros

In our marketing roles we handle a lot of campaign optimization and digging into data. We take advantage of this tool's built-in Google Sheets questions to give candidates datasets they can manipulate and analyze right inside the testing environment. Every cell in those spreadsheets gets automatically inspected and scored for us which has reclaimed an enormous amount of time since we previously had to go through and grade every single candidate response by hand.

Cons

only numbers inside cells are eligible for automatic checking and scoring. Still, the support team helped us come up with a workaround to validate non-numeric entries which was really helpful and made the limitation much less of an issue.

“great tool

Pros

We really value that our sales engineers combine selling ability with technical know-how. To mimic real sales situations we ask candidates for video replies and free-text answers which helps evaluate how they'd handle calls and draft emails. And when it comes to the technical pieces, we can conveniently test coding and SQL capabilities.

Cons

I don't have any real complaints, the whole process felt simple and smooth, from the initial onboarding all the way through distributing the tests.