GitLab Reviews

“powerful devops toolkit”

Pros

After a while it just fades into the background of the workflow which is exactly what I want from a tool like this. It brings together a full DevOps toolkit and fits in naturally without getting in the way. There is basically no training needed to get started and when you do want to go further, the documentation is extensive, just like you would expect from a top tier open source product. The interface is simple enough that you can use it without constantly stopping to think about where things are. Even if something is not obvious at first, you usually end up understanding its purpose when the need comes up. The built-in CI/CD is a huge advantage. I am usually very hesitant about Docker-related technologies and not eager to spend time dealing with them the way it integrates them into CI/CD really works for me. It makes application testing much more efficient and easy and it helps improve both the quality and security of my products.

Cons

The part that bothers me most is that while you can disable certain repository features you do not use some of them still clutter the interface and cannot be removed. It feels like the software keeps those visible partly as a way to push users toward upgrading to a higher plan.

“love the version control”

Pros

It has been a really efficient solution for our company when it comes to organizing projects. It fits perfectly into a DevOps workflow because it includes so many useful features, from bug and error tracking to version management. It also connects well with the IDEs people use most which makes creating pull requests fast and convenient. On top of that, the platform feels quite stable and the pricing is very reasonable.

Cons

Even though it is a widely used tool, it still is not as popular as some of its competitors so the community around it does not feel quite as large. That said it has been growing steadily over time.

“appreciate the workflow and integrations”

Pros

Audit logs are really useful and managing admins is easy for us with extra configuration options, including group-based setup. It also connects with several third-party services and the Trello integration is handy if you want to use it for Scrum workflows. I can attach files to issues, merge requests and epics when needed and the file finder makes locating things much faster. Migration through Git is simple and the different analytics for workspace, productivity and contribution add a lot of value. Kanban boards are included as well and the Xcode integration is a big plus since it lets you open an Xcode project directly from the tool. Importing and exporting projects is supported too which makes project handling more flexible.

Cons

There doesn't seem to be a desktop client available. The project exploration section could be better organized, pages can load slowly at times and the community posts are fairly limited.

“version tracking changed our workflow”

Pros

Using this tool has completely changed the way my team and I keep track of important code updates. We only use it at a pretty basic level and even with that limited use, it has been extremely valuable. It has also made it much easier to document code changes that are handled across the team. Rather than relying on emails or manually following edits in the code, the version history and documentation are all there and visible for everyone involved. Another big plus is that it can be customized to fit the specific needs of your team and the way you work.

Cons

Getting comfortable with git commands does take time and like learning any new language, there is definitely some pracrtice required. Once it starts to click though, it becomes a very universal tool that is useful well beyond just one project or team.

“all-in-one dev platform”

Pros

I appreciate that private repositories are free and it comes with built-in CI/CD plus integration with GCP. The UI/UX are polished and user-friendly.

Cons

I have no complaints because it is like one of the most complete platforms out there with everything available in a single place.

“merge requests and IDE support”

Pros

Creating merge requests in this tool is very easy and it comes with plugin support for Git as well as several development IDEs like WebStorm, IntelliJ and Visio. It also integrates well with source control tools which makes development work more convenient.

Cons

Setting it up from the command prompt on Windows or Mac can be a bit tricky. Other than that, I have not really come across any defects or bugs in the software.

“clean interface”

Pros

Using it is easy and the modern interface makes my day-to-day work pleasant. GitLab Enterprise is also a really good self-hosted option that gives strong control over projects.

Cons

We did run into a few problems with certificates and some user permission errors. That may have been related to our own setup though.

“worthy GitHub alternative”

Pros

It works well as an alternative to GitHub and other source control platforms. Since GitHub is now part of Microsoft, having an independent option like this is definitely a plus.

Cons

Even with the steady improvements it keeps making, I still lean toward GitHub overall. It has gotten better over time but GitHub remains my first choice.

“team coding powerhouse”

Pros

Working with this product has been excellent for our team-based development. Its features cover everything from creating repositories and setting permissions to handling merge requests. Overall it provides all the tools needed to manage a project effectively.

Cons

One thing that is missing is a fully searchable comment thread feature which makes it much more difficult to track down older comments when needed.

“gives self hosting option”

Pros

A free plan is available which makes it simple to test before committing. It comes with built-in CI/CD the issue tracking with boards works well for most needs and you can invite different users with different permission levels. The self-hosting option is also a big plus.

Cons

The issue tracking isn't quite on the level of Jira and similar tools although it still covers most common use cases well enough. The licensing can feel a bit confusing since it's open source but not everything is actually free even when you host it yourself. It can also get expensive if you need certain features.

“reliable version control hub”

Pros

Being able to track code versions properly as a developer is one of its biggest advantages. Since it is open source, that is another big plus. It is a stable platform for pushing and pulling code, as well as creating merge requests. It also helps keep code protected and secure for users.

Cons

At times, resolving conflicts between branches can be challenging. It would also help if there were technology-based filters to make things easier to navigate. Another useful improvement would be the ability to automatically schedule scripts directly from the tool.

“good for issue tracking”

Pros

Having continuous integration built in along with reliable issue management makes building and testing software pretty simple for us to use.

Cons

There's no desktop client available so you have to rely on the CLI or a third-party app. Other than that, I really don't have any complaints.

“fast, secure private repos”

Pros

Everything about it feels spot on-it's fast, secure and very simple to use. On top of that it gives any user the option to create private repositories.

Cons

Honestly I haven't come across anything negative to say about this application.

“modern devops toolkit”

Pros

Even though I use it more for personal projects than work, it still clearly feels like a powerful DevOps platform. It goes well beyond basic Git collaboration and includes a lot of tools that help make secure development much more manageable. The interface feels more modern than GitHub and the fact that it is not owned by Microsoft is definitely a benefit in a lot of people's eyes.

Cons

Considering how strong it is as a competitor to GitHub, I rarely heard it mentioned much in the industry. I just wish I had come across it much earlier.

“powerful self-hosted git platform”

Pros

It competes pretty well with GitHub and gives you more flexibility when it comes to hosting. It's especially valuable for companies that can't rely on the cloud or prefer to run their own instance. It's clearly better than the other alternatives I've tried. It's easy to use, quick and includes most of the features I need.

Cons

It doesn't integrate with everything and at the end of the day it's still mainly an SCM platform rather than a broader developer ecosystem. GitHub offers more in that area, with things like GitHub Actions and a package registry.

“simple project deployment”

Pros

Project deployment has been really convenient using this tool. Pushing to and pulling from repositories is easy and the private sharing option also helps me a lot with managing project security across everything I'm working on.

Cons

At the beginning, it can feel a bit complicated for new users. More helpful documentation around common issues would be a big advantage and make the platform more approachable.

“secure private repos and collaboration”

Pros

It gives teams a safe and secure place to store code projects and files which makes working together much easier. Bringing repositories over from other Git platforms like GitHub is also very smooth and it carries over version history along with all related branches. Being able to keep certain repositories private is a big plus too especially since many competing Git services charge extra for that feature.

Cons

Although the interface looks clean and responds well, it can still be difficult to navigate and fully learn. New users will likely need some training before they feel comfortable using it. Integration with external tools also feels limited since many options like GitKraken need a premium license to work with this one. On top of that, user management can be confusing because the interface is not very clear in that area and the different permission levels are not explained well.

“improved our workflow”

Pros

We moved over to this product because it gave us a lot more than the usual Git-based SaaS tools on the market. It is not just a place to store code and that was a big reason for the switch. The built-in CI/CD features for automation, along with automated artifacts, made it a much more complete platform for our workflow.

Cons

Product stability was not always ideal. We had recurring hiccups where pipeline runners would go down and sometimes other parts of the system were affected too. The pricing is also quite high and each jump to the next plan feels steep since the cost goes up by about 4x.

“open-source hosting done right”

Pros

Among the tools I was most excited to try were the built-in CI and CD features and they've been one of the strongest parts of the platform for me. I really appreciate that it is an open source and lets me run my own server which is perfect for keeping important repositories private.

Cons

Getting everything set up was a little more involved than with tools like GitHub but not enough to make it a poor option for private projects.

“powerful enterprise source control”

Pros

It is one of the most efficient source control platforms available especially in its enterprise offering. I've worked with their enterprise in different organizations to manage codebasesand it has handled the requirements effectively. Its Git foundation also makes everyday usage simple and efficient.

Cons

I honestly don't have any complaints. It's a powerful platform because it's built on top of Git and it makes developers' day-to-day work much easier.