![]() | ![]() |
| Starting price: $449/month | Starting price: Custom |
| Best for: Urgent care, Dental practices | Best for: Orthopedic, Sports medicine |
| Mobile app: iOS, Android | Mobile app: Unavailable |
Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (3.4) | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (3.9) |
The selection of electronic medical record (EMR) or electronic health record (EHR) software is a decisive moment for any medical practice. These systems can significantly influence efficiency, patient care, and overall practice success.
eClinicalWorks and ChartLogic are two prominent players in the healthcare software market, offering comprehensive solutions for medical practices. Both software aim to streamline operations, improve coordination, boost data security, reduce manual work, and raise the standard of care. However, they differ in their specific features, strengths, and target user bases.
In this in-depth comparison, we will dissect both software, discussing their key features, benefits, drawbacks, pricing, and user experience. By the end, you’ll be well-equipped to make an informed decision that aligns with your practice’s unique needs.

eClinicalWorks has established itself as a comprehensive healthcare platform, catering to a diverse range of medical practices, including dental, behavioral health, and urgent care. Trusted by over 180,000 physicians and 850,000 healthcare professionals, it offers tools for patient scheduling, billing, telehealth, and more.
A standout feature of eClinicalWorks is its AI capabilities, which can be used for tasks such as scribing medical documents/notes, patient engagement, and fax management.
Turning our attention to ChartLogic, we find a solution that focuses on practice management, patient engagement, and revenue cycle management. It is particularly well-suited for practices in preventative medicine, physical therapy, and orthopedic surgery.
What stands out about ChartLogic is its managed IT services, which allow practices to outsource their IT operations and focus on providing patient care.
Feature | eClinicalWorks | ChartLogic |
AI Capabilities |
|
|
Patient Engagement |
|
|
Revenue Cycle Management |
|
|
Voice Dictation |
|
|
Telehealth |
|
|
Patient Portal |
|
|
e-Prescribe |
|
|
Security and Compliance |
|
|
![]() | ![]() |
| Pros | Pros |
|
|
| Cons | Cons |
|
|
In this side-by-side features comparison, we’ll explore the standout features of eClinicalWorks and ChartLogic to help you make a well-informed decision for your practice:

When selecting an EHR or EMR system, pricing can significantly influence your final choice. Each healthcare practice comes with its own budget and operational priorities, so understanding how eClinicalWorks and ChartLogic structure their pricing is crucial to finding the right fit.
eClinicalWorks Pricing Breakdown
eClinicalWorks presents three pricing options designed to cater to various healthcare practices:
- EHR Only: $449/month/provider
- EHR with Practice Management: $599/month/provider
- RCM as a Service: 2.9% of practice collections
ChartLogic Pricing Breakdown
ChartLogic uses a custom pricing model, adjusting its rates according to the specific needs of your practice. Pricing varies based on the features and services you choose.
Comparing The Two
When comparing the pricing models of eClinicalWorks and ChartLogic, their approaches cater to different needs. eClinicalWorks offers straightforward, tiered pricing, making costs easy to predict. In contrast, ChartLogic provides custom pricing tailored to the specific practice requirements.

eClinicalWorks receives mixed reviews from users. While some praise its wide range of features, including patient engagement tools and telehealth, others find the interface a little overwhelming. Clinicians appreciate its ability to streamline check-ins and simplify billing, but a learning curve seems to exist. Overall, eClinicalWorks seems like a strong choice for practices seeking a powerful toolset to improve workflow, as long as they're prepared for some initial complexity.
ChartLogic is lauded for its user-friendliness and intuitive interface. Mental health professionals particularly enjoy its functionality for managing patient progress and utilizing templates. Several reviewers appreciated the software's responsiveness to feedback. While the software may not have a feature set like eClinicalWorks, ChartLogic seems to prioritize a smooth user experience and seamless integration with other software.

Deciding between eClinicalWorks and ChartLogic largely depends on your practice’s unique priorities.
If you need a feature-rich platform with powerful AI capabilities, thought-out telehealth options, and advanced patient engagement tools, eClinicalWorks can be the ideal choice.
On the other hand, if you prefer a user-friendly system with efficient workflow solutions, managed IT services, and strong RCM support, ChartLogic may be the better fit.
Ultimately, your decision should be guided by the specific needs of your practice. For expert advice, our team at Software Finder is here to assist in making the best choice for your healthcare operations.



