If you work in litigation, you already know that modern legal work runs on data. Emails, Slack messages, cloud files, video recordings, and the volume of electronically stored information in any given case can be staggering.

That is exactly what eDiscovery (electronic discovery) platforms are built to handle. Such tools help legal teams identify, collect, review, and produce digital evidence in a way that is defensible, organized, and fast.

In high-stakes or data-heavy matters, the choice of platform can significantly impact speed, cost, and control. Two names come up more than any others in that conversation: Everlaw and Relativity. 

Both are heavyweights in the eDiscovery space, but they were built with very different teams in mind, and choosing the wrong one can cost your firm far more than just the subscription fee. 

Before we get into the head-to-head, here is a quick look at what each platform actually is. 

Head-On Comparison

Everlaw 

Everlaw is a cloud-native eDiscovery platform built for legal teams who want speed, simplicity, and modern AI without a spending weeks to learn how to use it. Founded in 2012 and headquartered in Oakland, California, it runs entirely in the cloud with no infrastructure overhead.

It is particularly popular among law firms, government agencies, and in-house corporate teams who need a powerful tool. Its flagship features include an intuitive document review interface, the Storybuilder case narrative tool, and the EverlawAI suite covering everything from predictive coding to natural language search. 

Relativity 

Relativity is one of the most established names in eDiscovery, with a market presence stretching back to 2001. Its flagship product, RelativityOne, is a cloud-based platform built on Microsoft Azure, though it also offers an on-premises version that few modern competitors can match.

It is the default choice for large law firms, major corporations, and government agencies that need deep customization and the ability to handle the most complex, high-volume matters. Relativity prioritizes control, supported by advanced workflows, deep integrations, and a vast ecosystem of third-party partners and developers. 

Everlaw 

Starting Price: $250/month 

Best For: Mid‑size to large firms 

Mobile App: Not Available 

User Ratings: 4.8/5 

Get Demo

Disclaimer: Pricing references are based on publicly available third-party information and industry benchmarks. Actual costs may vary. 

 

Relativity 

Starting Price: $5,075/month 

Best For: Large‑scale, complex litigation and government investigations 

Mobile App: iOS 

User Ratings:

Get Demo

Disclaimer: Pricing references are based on publicly available third-party information and industry benchmarks. Actual costs may vary. 

 

Relativity Vs Everlaw Feature Comparison

Feature category 

Relativity

Everlaw 

Data collection & ingestion 

✓ 

✓ 

OCR & deduplication 

✓ 

✓ 

Advanced search & filters 

✓ 

✓ 

Email threading 

✓ 

✓ 

Review tags & coding 

✓ 

✓ 

Redaction tools 

✓ 

✓ 

AI‑assisted review / suggestions 

✓ 

✓ 

Strong security & audit logs 

✓ 

✓ 

Flexible export & productions 

✓ 

✓ 

Collaboration tools (notes, sharing) 

✓ 

✓ 

Large‑scale / complex matters 

✓ 

✗ 

Very fast UI / low learning curve 

✗ 

✓ 

Deep workflow customization 

✓ 

✗ 

Built‑in trial‑prep tools 

✗ 

✓ 

ECA + AI‑driven filters 

✗ 

✓ 

Extensive third‑party integrations (ECM, DLP, etc.) 

✓ 

✗ 

Native litigation‑readiness + “argue‑ready” analytics 

✗ 

✓ 

Who Is It For?

Everlaw 

  • Law Firms: Serves boutiques to large firms with transparent pricing and fast onboarding 
  • Corporations: Gives in‑house teams control over discovery in a single secure platform 
  • State And Local Government: Helps agencies modernize eDiscovery with StateRAMP Moderate Authorization 
  • Federal Government: Built for federal teams using FedRAMP‑authorized AI on AWS GovCloud 
  • Everlaw For Good: Provides free or discounted access to nonprofits and pro bono teams 

Relativity 

  • Corporations: Serves corporate legal teams managing eDiscovery, investigations, contracts, and data access requests 
  • Energy And Oil And Gas: Built for complex, high-stakes data with end‑to‑end scalability and control 
  • Financial Services: Helps financial institutions align with fast‑changing regulations using trusted technology 
  • Pharmaceutical And Life Sciences: Enables faster movement through regulatory pressure and cross‑border data needs 
  • Technology: Matches rapid innovation pace with powerful generative AI‑driven legal tech 
  • Law Firms: Powers 198 of the Am Law 200, from huge to small matters 
  • Federal Agencies: Built for US federal agencies using FedRAMP‑authorized software on a hardened cloud 
  • Litigators: Helps litigators surface risk early and automate manual work with AI 
  • State And Local Agencies: Helps manage more cases, investigations, and public records with minimal IT 
  • Academic Programs: Relativity Academic offers hands‑on RelativityOne experience for students at no cost 

How Well Do These Platforms Scale?

Scalability isn't just a nice-to-have aspect, it is what separates a platform that grows with your caseload from one that buckles under it. 

Everlaw 

Everlaw is built entirely in the cloud, which allows teams to start quickly and scale easily without complex setup. Its ingestion pipeline can process up to one million documents per hour during initial data import, while its Deep Dive AI feature has been tested and validated on datasets exceeding ten million documents. For most firms, that is more than enough headroom, and Everlaw achieves it with minimal setup. 

Relativity 

Relativity scales through a combination of its cloud product, RelativityOne, and an on-premises option for organizations that need full control over their infrastructure. This makes it the stronger choice for large enterprises handling highly complex, multi-jurisdictional matters. The platform offers its services in 17 countries including Japan, Brazil, Hong Kong, Singapore, etc. 

Our Take
  • Everlaw — Best for firms that need fast, frictionless scaling without managing infrastructure.
  • Relativity — Best for enterprises handling massive, multi-jurisdictional matters that demand elastic, configurable scale.

Which One Offers A Smooth Onboarding Experience?

Imaging getting the budget approved for a high-end eDiscovery platform from the finance department only for employees to take months and years getting used to it. This is why its important to choose a platform that not only offers smooth onboarding but also ease of use. 

Everlaw 

Usability isn't something Everlaw bolted on later because it was clearly part of the plan from day one. Finding what you need is rarely a guessing game, and most people get the hang of the essentials pretty quickly, often within the same day they start. What really stands out is how the platform handles its more advanced features. Things like predictive coding, analytics, and redactions tend to make people nervous in other tools, but in Everlaw they just feel… manageable.

Relativity 

Relativity is genuinely impressive, but it's not exactly plug-and-play. If you're new to it, expect to need some hand-holding at first, i.e. a proper setup process, someone internally who knows the system, and a real onboarding plan before people can confidently work on their own. That's not necessarily a dealbreaker though. For bigger firms that already have a dedicated eDiscovery team in place, putting in that groundwork tends to be worth it in the long run.

Our Take
  • Everlaw — Best for teams that need to be productive from day one, no training required.
  • Relativity — Best for experienced eDiscovery professionals who prioritize power and control over simplicity.

Total Cost Of Ownership Of The Platforms

When you are part of a corporation or a firm, it's not just your department and team deciding how much you will be spending on a certain tool, but a finance team. And this is why this section is very important for you to see which platform is actually within your budget and what you may need to do to convince Finance to give just a little more budget. 

Everlaw 

Everlaw's pricing plans start at $250/month, with implementation fee ranging between $5,000 to $20,000 and data migration fee ranging between $10,000 to $50,000. 

Everything from predictive coding and analytics to Storybuilder and onboarding support is included in the base rate. Single-document AI actions are also included at no extra cost, while batch AI actions operate on a credits system. 

Disclaimer: Pricing references are based on publicly available third-party information and industry benchmarks. Actual costs may vary. 

Relativity 

For small deployment, according to the industry benchmarks, Relativity could cost around $5,075/month. Implementation could typically fall between $10,000–$50,000 while data migration may go up to $25,000+. 

Buyers can choose between a pay-as-you-go option or a one-to-three year subscription commitment, with variable data tiers that adjust costs depending on how much data they are actively working with. Additional products like aiR for Review, aiR for Privilege, Legal Hold, and Contracts are each priced separately. 

Disclaimer: Pricing references are based on publicly available third-party information and industry benchmarks. Actual costs may vary. 

Our Take
  • Everlaw — Best for firms that need predictable monthly costs with no surprise add-on fees.
  • Relativity — Best for larger organizations that can negotiate custom contracts and absorb variable costs.

Comparing Support And Responsiveness

Yes ease of use is important, but what is equally important is how fast can a platform take you out of a mess you accidentally created. And most of the time, teams decide to not go with software because pre-existing users complain about customer support. Nobody would like to disrupt their workflows because the platform’s customer support went on the holidays to Maldives for 15 days.

Everlaw 

One thing that genuinely stands out about Everlaw is how they handle support. If you run into something, you can reach their team seven days a week, whether that's a quick phone call, an email, or jumping on a screen share to walk through the issue together. 

Onboarding is also complimentary — including data migration, live training sessions, and personalized kick-off calls with a customer success team member. There are no professional services fees for standard onboarding, and no penalty for asking too many questions. 

Relativity 

Relativity offers 24/7 technical support directly to RelativityOne customers, backed by a global team and supplemented by one of the largest partner ecosystems in the eDiscovery industry. That ecosystem, made up of Provider, Distributor, Advisor, and Developer partners, is both a strength and a caveat.

Where these partners really earn their keep is in the complicated stuff — custom workflows, tricky implementations, managed review services. The flip side, though, is that for everyday support issues, you're usually going back through that same partner rather than straight to the source. And that's where things can get inconsistent.  

Your experience ends up depending a lot on who your specific partner is rather than getting the same baseline level of service every time. 

Our Take
  • Everlaw — Best for firms that want direct, fast, in-house support included at no extra cost.
  • Relativity — Best for large organizations with dedicated eDiscovery teams who benefit from a global partner network.

Which Platforms Offer Better Integrations?

At the end of the day, how well a platform plays with your other tools matters more than people often realize upfront. If the integrations are solid, your team can stay focused on the actual review work. If they're not, you end up with people manually shuffling data between systems, and that gets annoying really fast.  

The gap between a clean, well-connected integration and a clunky back-and-forth export-import process isn't just an annoyance. It can quietly eat up days on a matter, and when you factor in the billable hours and added overhead, the cost adds up faster than expected. 

Platform 

Integrations 

Everlaw 

Microsoft 365, Jira, Slack, Zoom, Zendesk, Salesforce, Asana, Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive 

Relativity 

Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Slack, Teams, ChatGPT Enterprise, Google Gemini 

Everlaw 

Everlaw's cloud connectors cover a broad range of enterprise applications. Some of these names are Microsoft 365 Software, Jira Software, Slack Software, Zoom, Zendesk, Salesforce, Asana, and Purview. You can also get integrations with cloud storage platforms such as Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive, ShareFile, and Google Vault. 

Everlaw's cloud connectors allow for extraction of data straight from the source, followed by direct transfer into the review platform, where data is automatically processed for review.

Once connected, data is automatically processed, transcribed where applicable, and indexed for review, meaning the time between collection and eyes-on-document review is compressed significantly. However, not all cloud-based apps are available in Everlaw GovCloud. 

Relativity 

Relativity's integration depth is broader and more technically configurable, reflecting its enterprise positioning. Its Collect application supports direct data ingestion from Microsoft 365, Google Workspace Software, Slack, Teams, ChatGPT Enterprise, Google Gemini, and mobile device collections via Cellebrite. 

Its most significant recent integration is Purview Sync; a dedicated pipeline that automates the transfer of Microsoft 365 data from Purview Premium eDiscovery into RelativityOne. Users can skip the need to manually export files, stage them on FTP servers, or pass them between IT, legal, outside counsel, and service providers. 

Beyond native integrations, Relativity's App Hub gives access to hundreds of third-party applications built by the developer ecosystem. That ecosystem depth is unmatched but navigating it often requires a partner or internal administrator. 

Our Take
  • Everlaw — Best for teams that want a broader set of out-of-the-box cloud connectors with minimal setup.
  • Relativity — Best for enterprises that need deeper, more configurable integrations and a larger third-party ecosystem, even if that requires more administrative or partner support.

Data Security Beyond Business Hours

Both Everlaw and Relativity take security seriously, but they approach it differently and serve slightly different compliance needs as a result. 

Everlaw 

Everlaw's compliance certifications include SOC 2 Type 2 in security, availability, confidentiality, and privacy. The platform also includes SOC 3, FedRAMP Moderate Authorization, StateRAMP Moderate Authorization, HIPAA, GDPR and CCPA, Cyber Essentials Plus, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, and ISO 27018. 

Everlaw’s compliance certifications help legal teams demonstrate that their data is protected under recognized security and privacy standards, which can simplify audits, reduce risk in cross‑border matters, and make it easier to meet client and regulatory requirements. 

All customer data is encrypted in transit and at rest using AES-256 encryption, and the platform maintains average annual uptime exceeding 99.9%, including scheduled maintenance windows. 

Everlaw regularly performs proactive intrusion detection, vulnerability scanning, penetration testing, and continuous monitoring on its codebase. It also employs independent third-party security experts to perform penetration tests on an annual basis. 

Relativity 

Relativity's security program is anchored by Calder7, its in-house global security team, which has won multiple industry awards. These include the 2023 Microsoft Security ISV of the Year, the 2024 CSO Award, and the 2024 CyberSecurity Breakthrough Award for Privileged Access Management Solution of the Year. 

The platform's Security Center detects, predicts, and responds to threats in real time, keeping sensitive data protected 24/7, backed by Calder7 and enhanced by a strategic partnership with Microsoft. 

On the compliance side, Relativity holds SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 and ISO 27018, FedRAMP Moderate ATO, HIPAA, and IRAP at the Protected level.

The platform also supports hybrid environments combining cloud and on-premises instances, which remains a compelling alternative for organizations in data-sovereign regions where full cloud hosting is not permissible. 

Our Take
  • Everlaw — Best for US federal, state, and local government agencies needing FedRAMP and StateRAMP coverage.
  • Relativity — Best for global enterprises and data-sovereign regions requiring on-premises deployment or IRAP certification.

Who’s Ahead In The AI Game?

Generative AI has moved from a buzzword to a genuine differentiator in eDiscovery. Both Everlaw and Relativity have invested heavily here, but the architecture of their AI strategies reflects the broader difference in how each platform is built. 

Area 

Everlaw 

Relativity 

AI suite 

EverlawAI 

aiR 

Core approach 

Unified AI inside one review platform 

Purpose-built AI tools for specific legal workflows 

Key strength 

Fast, citation-backed review and everyday usability 

Defensible, high-control AI for complex enterprise matters 

Review workflow 

Deep Dive, Review Assistant, Coding Suggestions 

aiR for Review, aiR for Privilege 

Case strategy support 

Writing Assistant for drafting and extraction 

aiR for Case Strategy 

Privilege review 

Not the main emphasis in this section 

Dedicated aiR for Privilege tool 

Breach response 

Not highlighted here 

aiR for Data Breach Response 

Defensibility 

Citations and written justifications built into key tools 

Reasoning provided for AI decisions 

Best fit 

Teams wanting integrated AI across the review lifecycle 

Enterprises needing specialized AI across demanding workflows 

Everlaw 

Everlaw's AI is organized under the EverlawAI suite. It offers a set of tools designed to accelerate every stage of the review lifecycle from within a single platform. The centerpiece is Deep Dive, which allows legal professionals to ask natural language questions directly across datasets exceeding ten million documents and receive answers grounded in specific document citations. 

  • Coding Suggestions uses generative AI to automatically classify documents with written justifications for each decision 
  • The Review Assistant handles single-document summaries, Q&A, topic analysis, and custom extractions 
  • Writing Assistant turns evidence directly into initial drafts of legal arguments. It supports automated translations across more than 100 languages 
  • Predictive Coding and Concept Clustering round out the suite, using machine learning to surface the most relevant documents and expose hidden thematic connections across a corpus 

Relativity 

Relativity's AI strategy is built around its aiR product suite, developed in collaboration with Microsoft Azure OpenAI and positioned as a set of purpose-built generative AI tools for the most demanding legal workflows. 

  • aiR For Review analyzes documents and surfaces the ones most likely to matter, with reasoning provided for each decision, a design aimed at defensibility as much as speed 
  • aiR For Privilege automates privilege review, a notoriously expensive and error-prone process, cutting privilege review time by over 50% according to user-reported results 
  • aiR For Case Strategy helps attorneys build case narratives and prepare for depositions 
  • aiR For Data Breach Response accelerates the identification of personal information in breach notification matters 

The platform is also developing agentic AI workflows and systems where AI can take multi-step actions autonomously, as the next frontier of its product roadmap. 

Our Take
  • Everlaw — Best for teams wanting citation-backed, review-native AI with lighter setup and strong everyday usability, though batch AI usage is credit-based.
  • Relativity — Best for enterprises needing broader, highly configurable AI workflows, especially for complex privilege, case strategy, and other high-stakes review use cases.

Let’s Hear From Real Users

Every software looks great on paper, but it can never be the sole reason to buy and implement it. It’s not only about money but resources and time that is wasted if you end up choosing the wrong platform. This is why I sifted through a dozen real user reviews on various people’s forums and participated in discussions to know what users are saying about these two platforms.

Everlaw 

Real users say Everlaw is praised for speeding up document review, simplifying trial prep, and feeling more intuitive than older platforms, though some say that it can be hard to get used to the platform in the start. One user put it simply: “Once you learn Everlaw everything else seems so antiquated.” 

Relativity 

Users praise Relativity for being best in class for complex, enterprise-scale eDiscovery work, especially because its flexibility enables custom workflows and support for non-standard data types. “Relativity is definitely the best in class from my perspective as someone who's primarily into project management.” 

So, What Should You Pick? 

After comparing both platforms and looking deep into things that actually matter; scalability, usability, pricing, support, compliance, integrations, and AI, the honest answer is that neither platform is universally better. They are built for different buyers, and the right choice depends almost entirely on what your firm looks like and how you work. 

When To Choose Everlaw? 

  • You're a small firm, agency, nonprofit, etc. 
  • You want no dedicated eDiscovery admin 
  • You need fast onboarding 
  • You want AI built into the workflow, not as add-ons 
  • You need the quickest path for everything 

When To Choose Relativity? 

  • You belong to a major corporation, government sector or a large firm 
  • You have to manage complex, multi-jurisdictional matters 
  • You have strict data residency requirements 
  • You want custom workflows 
  • You need unmatched depth in customization and partner ecosystem 
  • You require a full enterprise AI suite 
  • You're ready for a more complex setup and higher costs 

At the end, the right platform will vary from firm to firm based on their needs and budget. Before committing to any platform, make sure you get to test the software to understand its ease of use and consult with preexisting users and experts.