Best for: Ambulatory and Primary Care, Solo and Small practices
Best for: Orthopedics, Urology
Mobile App: N/A
Mobile App: iOS, Android
Rating:3.6
Rating: 3.6
EHR systems are important in modern healthcare yet managing them can be time-consuming. According to the 2022 National Burnout Benchmarking report, 46% of healthcare professionals spend excessive hours on EHR tasks outside their regular work schedules. It highlights the need for an efficient and user-friendly EHR system to ease administrative burdens.
Among the many EHR solutions available, Practice Fusion and Allscripts are popular choices. Each platform offers several features to simplify practice management but caters to different needs and workflows.
This guide will provide a detailed comparison of Practice Fusion and Allscripts, analyzing their key features to help you decide which EHR system best suits your practice.
Practice Fusion Vs. Allscripts: Head-On Comparison
Practice Fusion EHR, acquired by Veradigm, is a cloud-based solution tailored for small to mid-sized ambulatory practices across various specialties. It improves clinical workflows through features like e-prescribing, patient charting, and billing integration. It is recognized for its user-friendly design and cost-effectiveness. It facilitates smooth communication with laboratories, pharmacies, and imaging centers, ensuring efficient interoperability.
Meanwhile, Allscripts EMR, now known as Veradigm, is a cloud-based healthcare platform that caters to diverse healthcare practices, including hospitals and outpatient clinics. It is known for its flexibility and patient engagement tools, enhancing communication and operational efficiency. The software allows medical practitioners to securely exchange patient information across systems.
Practice Fusion Vs. Allscripts: At A Glance
Feature
Practice Fusion
Allscripts
Cloud Access
✓
✓
Mobile Access
✓
✓
Telehealth
✓
✓
Medical Billing
✓
✓
Scheduling
✓
✓
Reporting
✓
✓
Integration
✓
✓
Document Management
✓
✗
Compliance
✓
✓
Support Options
✓
✓
Practice Fusion Vs. Allscripts: Pros And Cons
PROS
Web-based access from anywhere
Easy access to patient info
Extra features for record-keeping
Customizable template creation
Automates administrative tasks
Templates for easy documentation
Strong reporting and analytics tools
Seamless data sharing via integration
CONS
Hard to search past encounters
Difficult to delete appointments
Clunky notetaking process
Implementation is time-consuming
Requires thorough staff training
Limited customization options
Practice Fusion Vs. Allscripts: Side By Side Comparison
Scheduling
Practice Fusion: It offers online appointment booking through its ‘Patient Fusion’ profile, allowing patients to schedule visits and complete customizable online check-in forms before arrival. These forms automatically integrate with patient charts, reducing manual entry and enhancing data accuracy. The system helps providers manage new appointment requests directly within the EHR, saving time for both staff and patients.
Allscripts: It features an ‘AI-powered Predictive Scheduler’, which forecasts patient demand using historical data to optimize appointment slots. It automatically prioritizes high-need patients, reduces no-shows, and ensures efficient scheduling. The system also provides ‘Predictive Scheduler Direct’ for online patient booking and ‘SmartReach’ for automated patient messaging, improving overall scheduling accuracy.
Winner:
Allscripts takes the lead with its advanced AI-driven scheduling that predicts patient needs and dynamically adjusts appointments, reducing empty slots and improving patient access.
Reporting
Practice Fusion: The platform provides extensive reporting capabilities across quality, clinical, and practice management categories. It provides detailed reports for MIPS, eCQMs, and Meaningful Use dashboards, along with patient-specific data like diagnoses, medications, and referrals. Users can filter, export, and customize reports, enhancing practice oversight and compliance tracking.
Allscripts (Veradigm): The software offers basic automated reporting for PQRS, PCMH, and FQHC submissions. While it simplifies regulatory reporting, it lacks the depth and granularity of Practice Fusion’s extensive reporting suite.
Winner: Practice Fusion is superior due to its diverse, customizable reports and advanced search capabilities, enabling better data-driven decision-making and compliance management.
Charting
Practice Fusion: It has advanced, flexible charting with specialty-specific templates, ‘Note Assist’ shortcuts, and integrated dictation support. Providers can chart on any device, use customizable intake forms, and order tests directly from patient charts. Its ‘Smart Charting’ feature reduces clicks and keystrokes, enhancing efficiency and accuracy.
Allscripts: It focuses on automated chart retrieval through its ‘eChart Courier’ system. While it streamlines medical record sharing and supports value-based care, it lacks the robust in-chart functionalities and customization options provided by Practice Fusion.
Winner: It’s a draw. Practice Fusion stands out due to its device-friendly charting tools that optimize workflow. Meanwhile, Allscripts primarily emphasizes chart retrieval without enhancing in-chart efficiency.
E-Prescribing
Practice Fusion: The e-prescribing solution offers real-time prescription submission, automatic drug interaction checks, and integrated ‘eCoupons’ to reduce patient costs. It allows providers to manage prior authorizations, track prescription fulfillment, and prevent fraud through direct EHR integration.
Allscripts: The system enhances e-prescribing with advanced features like ‘Veradigm RxTruePrice’, offering real-time patient-specific drug pricing and automated prior authorizations. It supports electronic prescribing of controlled substances (EPCS) while also integrating with state prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMP), improving compliance and patient safety.
Winner: Allscripts leads due to its advanced price transparency tools, automated prior authorizations, and PDMP integration—offering a more comprehensive and efficient e-prescribing experience.
Billing
Practice Fusion: It offers integrated billing services with features like claims scrubbing, same-day submissions, and patient communication through electronic or paper statements. Their dedicated billing team, with over 30 years of experience across 45+ specialties, focuses on reducing denials and improving financial transparency. However, it lacks advanced analytics and real-time tracking.
Allscripts: It provides a comprehensive revenue cycle management solution with a 98% first-pass clean claims rate and 99% net collections. It offers advanced analytics, automated eligibility verification, and complete denial management. The service is scalable and flexible and supports complex billing regulations like MACRA and ICD-10, ensuring optimized revenue and operational efficiency.
Winner: Allscripts overwhelms Practice Fusion for its superior automation, advanced analytics, and higher collection efficiency, offering a more comprehensive and scalable billing solution.
Practice Fusion Vs. Allscripts: Pricing Plans
When comparing Practice Fusion and Allscripts (Veradigm) pricing plans, both offer different structures to accommodate various practice needs. Practice Fusion’s $199 per provider per month plan includes essential services like implementation, training, and support. However, it requires a yearly commitment, which may be a consideration for smaller practices with limited budgets.
In contrast, Allscripts offers a more flexible starting point with its ePrescribe module at $59 per month per prescriber and customizable pricing for advanced RCM services based on practice size and requirements.
While Practice Fusion provides a straightforward, all-inclusive rate, Allscripts’ modular pricing allows practices to pay only for the services needed. Ultimately, the best choice depends on the practice’s size, budget, and the complexity of its billing operations.
Practice Fusion Vs. Allscripts: What Users Have To Say?
Practice Fusion users frequently highlight the platform's intuitive interface and accessibility, especially for small to mid-sized practices. Many appreciate its ease of use and seamless patient documentation. However, some users report dissatisfaction with customer support responsiveness and limited customization options.
Meanwhile, Allscripts (Veradigm) is praised for its robust reporting features and comprehensive revenue cycle management tools. Users value its scalability for larger healthcare organizations but have expressed concerns about occasional system slowdowns and a steep learning curve.
Overall, both platforms receive mixed feedback—Practice Fusion stands out for user-friendliness. At the same time, Allscripts is recognized for its advanced capabilities, making the best choice dependent on a practice’s specific needs and workflow preferences.
Our Verdict: Which EHR Solution Is Right For Your Practice?
Both Practice Fusion and Allscripts (Veradigm) offer comprehensive EHR and billing solutions but cater to different practice needs. Practice Fusion is a user-friendly, cost-effective option ideal for smaller practices seeking straightforward workflows and integrated billing. In contrast, Allscripts provides advanced revenue cycle management and analytics, making it a better fit for larger practices with complex operational demands.
When choosing between these platforms, assessing your practice’s size, billing complexity, and required features is crucial. Selecting the right EHR can streamline administrative tasks, improve patient care, and reduce physician burnout—ensuring a more efficient and sustainable healthcare practice.
