eClinicalWorks Vs InSync: Comparing Usability And Features
eClinicalWorks Vs InSync: Comparing Usability And Features
Last Updated May 30, 2025· 8 mins Read
Written by
Arooj Aleem
Sr. Technical Content Writer
Starting Monthly Price: $449/month
Monthly Price: Starts at $75/month
Best for: Behavioral Health, Urgent Care
Best for: Behavioral Health
Mobile App: OS, Android
Mobile App: Not available
Rating:3.4
Rating: 4.4
A 2025 KLAS report found that 75 percent of users who are dissatisfied with their EHR continue to report low satisfaction even after two years. In addition, studies show that poor EHR usability can contribute to clinician burnout and even lead to errors, which can affect patient care and safety. This highlights the importance of choosing the right software from the beginning, one that supports patient-centered care, fits smoothly into your clinical workflows, and ensures regulatory compliance.
Among the many EHR options available, eClinicalWorks and InSync are two of the most widely used platforms. Both have proven to be reliable choices for practices, but they differ in several key areas, such as usability and core features.
In this eClinicalWorks vs InSync comparison, we will explore their functionalities, user satisfaction ratings, and overall value to help you determine which software best aligns with your practice’s needs.
Head-On Comparison
eClinicalWorks is an all-in-one EHR and practice management platform designed for healthcare practices of all sizes across various specialties. It offers a unified suite that combines AI-powered EHR, patient engagement, revenue cycle management, value-based care, telehealth, and population health tools. The platform is trusted by more than 850,000 healthcare professionals and was named the most improved physician practice product in the 2024 KLAS report.
InSync EHR by Qualifacts is a fully integrated, cloud-based solution designed specifically for small to mid-sized behavioral and mental health practices. The software combines scheduling, charting, billing, e-prescription, telehealth, and claims management tools in one configurable platform. With over 25 years of experience in the behavioral health space, it helps behavioral health providers streamline operations, improve patient care, and simplify administrative tasks.
eClinicalWorks And InSync: At A Glance
Feature
eClinicalWorks
InSync
Scheduling
✓
✓
AI Capabilities
✓
✓
Telehealth
✓
✓
Customization Options
✓
✓
Mobile Access
✓
✓
Electronic Prior Authorization
✓
✗
E-Prescribing
✓
✓
Medical Billing
✓
✓
PROS
Easy access to patient history
Streamlined onboarding and setup
Customizable charting for specialties
Automatic billing claim generation
Color-coded appointment scheduling
Granular reporting with filters
Efficient claims submission process
Simple note-taking workflow
Compatible with external tools
Responsive customer support team
CONS
Outdated user interface design
Complex data migration process
Issues with printing patient receipts
Slow loading for some screens
Too many navigation options
No copy-paste functionality in charts
Side By Side Comparison
Both eClinicalWorks and InSync provide integrated tools designed to help healthcare facilities streamline their clinical, administrative, and financial workflows. This breakdown will compare their key features to help you determine which platform best fits your workflows.
AI Capabilities
eClinicalWorks delivers a comprehensive suite of AI tools integrated directly into its EHR and practice management system. Its ‘Sunoh.ai’ feature converts provider-patient conversations into clinical notes using ambient speech technology, while a ChatGPT-based assistant streamlines documentation, scheduling, and health record navigation. Additional tools include ‘Image AI’ for automating fax processing and an RPA-powered playlist system to eliminate repetitive tasks. The platform also uses AI to predict patient no-shows with up to 90% accuracy.
InSync uses its 'Qualifacts iQ engine' to support behavioral health providers with focused, AI-driven features. It offers AI-powered clinical documentation that auto-generates session notes for provider approval, enhancing accuracy and reducing admin time. Providers can also use an 'AI Assistant' to quickly locate EHR resources and documentation. Moreover, the platform’s agentic AI capabilities automate tasks like scheduling to reduce staff workload and improve efficiency.
Winner: eClinicalWorks takes the lead with its broader suite of AI-powered tools across clinical, operational, and predictive areas.
Billing And Revenue Cycle Managment
eClinicalWorks offers a deeply integrated revenue cycle management (RCM) solution that combines automation, analytics, and AI to streamline financial workflows. It automates claim scrubbing and submission, manages denials and appeals, and provides real-time insights into patient eligibility and payment trends. The software also includes dashboards for alerts, work queues, and KPIs to help large practices prioritize claims and monitor performance efficiently. Additionally, its ‘Agentic AI’ RCM system reduces manual effort by using autonomous agents to speed up reimbursements and minimize errors.
InSync streamlines billing through a rules-based engine that automates the application of ICD codes to appointments and carries them through the entire billing process. This reduces human error and helps ensure cleaner claims and better reimbursement outcomes. Designed specifically for behavioral health, the platform focuses on reducing revenue leakage and easing the workload of billing teams. Its integrated approach ensures accuracy and consistency from scheduling to final payment.
Winner: eClinicalWorks stands out with its layered automation and AI-powered billing tools that support both small and enterprise-level RCM operations.
Customization Options
eClinicalWorks offers a highly customizable platform that allows providers to tailor templates, order sets, and patient-facing tools to their specific needs. Practices can personalize the patient portal with custom branding and select which features patients can access. The software also offers customizable forms, questionnaires, and satisfaction surveys to support patient engagement and pre-visit data collection. Additionally, it provides custom clinical and financial integrations that align with practice-specific billing processes.
InSync provides full configurability to meet the unique needs of behavioral health and human services organizations. During onboarding, the vendor helps set up specialized workflows and dashboards tailored to each role. This role-based setup ensures providers and administrators interact with the system in a way that matches their day-to-day responsibilities. It helps streamline operations while supporting different clinical and administrative needs.
Winner: Tie. Both eClinicalWorks and InSync offer strong customization options with a slight difference in their approach. eClinicalWorks focuses on customizable templates and features, while InSync provides role-based workflows and dashboards.
Telehealth
eClinicalWorks provides a comprehensive telehealth solution through its ‘healow’ platform, which is HIPAA-compliant and designed for both primary care physicians and specialists. Providers can initiate visits via text or email without requiring downloads or logins, and patients can join using any device. It also includes features such as pre-visit questionnaires, mobile apps, appointment scheduling, vital sign collection, and the ability for providers to document progress notes. The platform integrates smoothly with any EHR system and supports progress note documentation during virtual visits.
InSync offers individual and group telehealth capabilities, which are ideal for smaller practices. It allows providers to launch telehealth sessions directly from the scheduler or within the encounter. The platform also helps behavioral health facilities reduce no-shows and cancellations by converting in-person appointments to virtual care sessions.
Winner: eClinicalWorks edges out InSync with its comprehensive, device-agnostic telehealth platform that is suitable for a wide range of providers.
Appointment Scheduling
eClinicalWorks supports online appointment scheduling through its ‘healow Open Access’ platform, which enables patients to book visits via the patient portal, provider website, or the healow app. Patients can view provider availability in real-time and easily book or request appointments at their convenience. This self-service functionality helps keep provider calendars full while easing the workload on front-office staff.
InSync offers a streamlined medical scheduling workflow through a web-based API that integrates directly with a provider’s website. New patients can complete intake forms, patient profiles, insurance details, and appointment information all in one session. After the required information is submitted, patients are automatically scheduled with the appropriate provider based on availability. Existing patients can also request follow-up appointments and automatically schedule visits with their preferred provider.
Winner: eClinicalWorks wins due to its multi-channel, real-time booking system and patient-centric scheduling features.
Pricing Comparison
eClinicalWorks offers three pricing plans to suit different practice needs. The EHR-only plan is priced at $449 per month per provider, while the EHR with Practice Management plan costs $599 per month per provider. For providers using their RCM services, the cost is 2.9% of practice collections. All plans come with no start-up costs, offering practices flexibility to get started without additional setup fees.
InSync, on the other hand, offers a more affordable pricing structure, starting at just $75 per user per month. This lower cost makes it an appealing choice for smaller behavioral health practices or agencies looking for a cost-effective EHR solution.
Disclaimer: The pricing is subject to change.
Not sure which EMR pricing plan is best for your practice? Check out our in-depth guide on EMR costs in 2025 to better understand pricing models and make an informed decision.
What Users Have To Say?
We gathered first-hand insights from users of both eClinicalWorks and InSync to better understand their experiences with each platform. Here are some of the most common feedback points:
eClinicalWorks is frequently praised for its smooth navigation and its ability to simplify documentation. Many users appreciate how the system helps keep their inboxes up to date and makes their daily tasks more manageable. One of the major highlights for users is eClinicalWorks’ ‘Sunoh.ai’ feature. A staff physician from Indiana University Health Center shared, " With Sunoh.ai, most of my documentation is completed before I leave the room. The AI captures just the important things and summarizes them very well into my documentation."
However, some users mention issues with mobile app functionality and the need to create support tickets for help, which can sometimes delay resolution.
InSync is appreciated for its all-in-one platform that integrates billing and progress notes, simplifying practice management. Many users love how easy it is to learn and navigate, even for those who aren't tech-savvy. A clinical director from a multi-therapy practice shared, “InSync provided flexibility and helped us achieve the right balance between customization and pre-configured templates, which speeds up the documentation process down the line.”
However, users have suggested that the ability to create custom reports would enhance the platform's flexibility. Some also mentioned that the customer support experience could be improved.
Wrapping Up: Which EHR Is Right For You?
Both eClinicalWorks and InSync offer powerful EHR software solutions, but they serve different needs and practice types.
eClinicalWorks is a versatile, all-in-one platform suitable for practices of all sizes. Its comprehensive features make it adaptable to various healthcare settings, including multi-specialty clinics. InSync, however, is particularly well-suited for small practices, especially in the behavioral health field. Its focus on simplicity and affordability makes it a great choice for practices looking for an easy-to-use system that doesn't overwhelm with unnecessary features.
Ultimately, your choice should depend on your practice size, specialty, and budget. Assess your unique needs and workflows to determine the best fit.