Picture

Monthly Price: Starting from $295/provider/month*

Best for: OB/GYN, Cardiology, Urgent Care

Mobile App: iOS

Rating: 3.3

Get Demo

*Pricing is subject to change.

Picture

Monthly Price: Starting from $350/month*

Best for: Orthopedics, Podiatry, Dermatology

Mobile App: iOS, Android

Rating: 3.5

Get Demo

*Pricing has been sourced from third-party websites and is subject to change.

The healthcare industry continues to evolve with a growing emphasis on efficiency, patient-centered care, and streamlined clinical workflows. As a result, the demand for an adaptable, user-focused electronic health record (EHR) platform has become increasingly critical.

Selecting the right EHR system is a strategic decision that can influence clinical efficiency, care coordination, and administrative performance.

In this regard, CureMD and ChartLogic are two well-established solutions, each offering a distinct approach to addressing the documentation, billing, and workflow needs of modern practices. While they both aim to improve care delivery and operational efficiency, they differ in terms of functionality, user experience, and capabilities.

In this comparison of CureMD vs. ChartLogic, we provide a detailed evaluation of their core features, user feedback, and pricing, offering clarity for providers assessing which system best aligns with their clinical and operational requirements.

Head On Comparison

CureMD is a cloud-based solution designed for various medical specialties. It offers a comprehensive suite that includes EHRs, practice management, medical billing, and patient portal. Its EHR includes electronic prescribing, electronic labs, and workflow automation with specialty-specific templates. The system also features powerful interoperability, enabling seamless data exchange across labs, pharmacies, and other healthcare providers CureMD has also been recognized by Black Book 2025 as a top-ranked EMR.

In contrast, ChartLogic delivers a specialty-focused EHR tailored for ambulatory practices. It features a voice-first interface with a customizable template builder, which allows providers to complete notes in under 90 seconds. It also offers integrated practice management, revenue cycle management, and a patient portal that supports online payments, appointment requests, and secure messaging.

CureMD Vs ChartLogic: At A Glance

Feature

CureMD

ChartLogic

Practice Management

Revenue Cycle Management

Voice Recognition

Interoperability

Telehealth

AI-Capabilities

Mobile EHR System

Customizable Clinical Forms

Comparison Strengths And Weaknesses

CureMD

ChartLogic

Pros:

User-friendly layout with seamless navigation

Simplified appointment management

Convenient access through mobile app

Cons:

EOB can be inconsistent at times

Occasional slowdowns during the claim scrubbing process

Pros:

Optimizes daily operations with customizable templates

Helps monitor patient activity with efficient tools

Supports better oversight of administrative tasks

Cons:

Third-party integrations may be limited

Challenges may occur during billing and claim submission

Side-By-Side Feature Comparison

Revenue Cycle Management

CureMD: CureMD delivers a strong end-to-end revenue cycle management (RCM) solution that includes eligibility verification, charge entry, claim submission (electronic/paper), denial resolution, patient billing, and advanced reporting. It seamlessly navigates growth and adapts to new reimbursement models based on the healthcare facility’s preferences without the need for extra resources. Moreover, its AI algorithms can automate tasks such as claims processing, payment posting, and denial management, thereby reducing manual effort and improving accuracy.

ChartLogic: Offers services that are more focused on reducing denials and improving collections. It covers insurance verification, charge capture, coding, claims submissions, and follow-up. The software also provides access to detailed analytics and monthly performance reviews. Additionally, ChartLogic creates customized reports unique to each practice and utilizes advanced tools to extract standard metrics that measure performance while also tailoring the reports to meet practitioners’ needs.

Winner: CureMD wins the round for native integration with clinical workflows, in-house compliance tools (such as MACRA/MIPS), and claim lifecycle automation.

Patient Portal

CureMD: CureMD’s patient portal ‘Leap’ empowers patients to take control of their care through a secure, user-friendly platform. It provides real-time access to health records, test results, prescriptions, and clinical summaries. Patients can easily book appointments, request refills, and message their care team directly. Moreover, Leap enhances continuity of care by providing post-visit insights, tracking medication adherence, and integrating wearable devices for remote monitoring.

ChartLogic: Offers a range of features in its patient portal, including online intake forms, bill payments, appointment requests, access to clinical summaries, and lab results. It emphasizes workflow optimization by streamlining pre-visit processes through digital forms and providing patients with full access to their medical records via a secure login.

Winner: CureMD stands out for its more advanced features, such as wearable devices, post-visit insights, and medication tracking.

Telemedicine

CureMD: Offers a fully embedded telemedicine platform integrated with its EHR, allowing providers to conduct HIPAA-compliant video visits directly from the system. It includes one-click scheduling, real-time charting access during visits, e-prescribing, consent capture, and automated documentation. The platform maintains regulatory compliance and data security while also enhancing continuity of care.

ChartLogic: Provides telehealth as a component of its EHR but does not feature native integration. It supports third-party telehealth tools and focuses on improving patient engagement and continuity of care through remote visits. While it is effective, the lack of in-system scheduling and direct chart access limits workflow efficiency.

Winner: CureMD excels due to its real-time access to clinical tools during visits and seamless documentation.

Specialty EHR

CureMD: Supports more than 30 specialties with tailored EHR templates, workflows, and clinical decision support. It offers highly customizable interfaces for various fields, such as cardiology, oncology, pain management, and psychiatry. Practices can modify templates and workflows without requiring development work, making CureMD suitable for diverse clinical setups.

ChartLogic: Provides a more deeply optimized experience for a focused set of high-specialty and surgical disciplines, including podiatry, urology, orthopedics, and general surgery. Its platform offers voice-command charting and specialty-specific forms that further help clinicians adapt it to their unique requirements. It also enables fast documentation and improved workflow efficiency for surgical specialists.

Winner: ChartLogic wins for its precision-built templates, voice-first tools, and optimized workflows for surgical specialties.

Pricing Plans For CureMD And ChartLogic

CureMD offers a transparent pricing model with four pricing packages, each consisting of various features while also catering to different types of organizations:

  • Practice Management – Custom Pricing
  • Electronic Health Records – $295/provider/month
  • All-in-One (PM + EHR) – Custom Pricing
  • Billing Services – As low as 3% of Collections

Disclaimer: Pricing is subject to change.

In contrast, ChartLogic offers custom pricing for healthcare practices starting from $350/provider/month. The plans may depend on the business's needs, features, functionalities, and capabilities.

Disclaimer: The pricing has been sourced from third-party websites and is subject to change.

Overall, CureMD presents more straightforward and affordable starting options. But, if you are looking for an EHR with a flexible approach toward plans, then ChartLogic is an ideal choice.

What Users Have To Say

Users highlight different strengths and weaknesses of both CureMD and ChartLogic.

CureMD is frequently praised for its intuitive interface and extensive features that support a wide range of medical specialties. Users also highlight its ease of use and quick responsiveness of customer support, with one physician stating that after years of use, they remain impressed by the interface and the strong support team of the platform.

However, some users have also experienced difficulties with the Explanation of Benefits (EOB) and occasional delays during the claim scrubbing process.

ChartLogic is appreciated for its customizable templates and user-friendly interface, with one user praising the note-taking experience, highlighting that the software’s encounters follow the traditional history and physical or SOAP note structure, the way medical records should be organized.

On the downside, some users have reported issues with the messaging system being unintuitive, requiring extra steps to timestamp them. Others have expressed a desire for more third-party integrations for a streamlined workflow.

CureMD Vs ChartLogic – Final Verdict

Choosing between CureMD and ChartLogic ultimately depends on your practice’s size, specialty focus, and workflow needs.

CureMD is better suited for small to mid-sized practices seeking a cost-effective, all-in-one solution. It offers native telemedicine, integrated RCM tools, and strong interoperability – making it ideal for organizations that prioritize seamless coordination across clinical and administrative operations.

On the other hand, ChartLogic is an ideal choice for surgical and high-specialty practices that require deep customization, voice-first charting, and template precision. Its specialty-focused design allows for faster documentation and improved efficiency in complex clinical environments.

Ultimately, the decision depends on aligning the EHR’s features, functionalities, and scalability with your practice size and requirements so it can increase operational efficiency and yield better patient outcomes.