athenaOne

athenaOne

322 Review(s)

AdvancedMD EHR

AdvancedMD EHR

307 Review(s)

eClinicalWorks

eClinicalWorks

279 Review(s)

Kareo EMR

Kareo EMR

195 Review(s)

CharmHealth EHR

CharmHealth EHR

158 Review(s)

Qualifacts CareLogic

Qualifacts CareLogic

141 Review(s)

Allscripts EMR

Allscripts EMR

111 Review(s)

PrognoCIS

PrognoCIS

103 Review(s)

CareCloud EHR

CareCloud EHR

60 Review(s)

TriMed Complete

TriMed Complete

1 Review(s)

Compare Features

table-img

MicroMD

table-img

AdvancedMD EHR

Appointment Management/Scheduling

e-Prescription

Lab Integrations

Patient Portal

Mobile App

Telemedicine

Billing and Invoicing

Claims Management

Customizable Forms

Patient Demographics

Make decisions with real reviews from real users

While microMD offers many valuable features, users have reported challenges such as its steep learning curve, resource-intensive implementation, customization limitations, occasional downtime, and scalability concerns for larger organizations. Considering these potential drawbacks, we've compiled a list of alternative solutions that may serve as suitable replacements for Medisoft, addressing some of the issues commonly associated with microMD.

MicroMD Feature Comparison with AdvancedMD

Shared Features:
1. Electronic Health Records (EHR)
2. Practice Management
3. Patient Scheduling
4. Billing and Invoicing
5. Patient Portal
6. E-Prescribing
7. Lab Integration
8. Document Management
9. Reporting and Analytics
10. Appointment Reminders
11. Clinical Workflow Management
12. Customizable Templates
13. Insurance Eligibility Verification
14. Patient Check-In
15. Mobile Access
16. Secure Messaging
17. Compliance Tracking
18. Telemedicine capabilities

Key Differences:

1. Medical Billing Services:
  - AdvancedMD offers dedicated medical billing services
  - Not explicitly mentioned for MicroMD

2. Patient Engagement Tools:
  - AdvancedMD emphasizes advanced patient engagement tools
  - MicroMD offers patient engagement features but doesn't highlight them as extensively

3. Reputation Management:
  - Mentioned as a feature for AdvancedMD
  - Not explicitly mentioned for MicroMD

4. Financial Analytics and Business Intelligence:
  - AdvancedMD offers advanced reporting capabilities through AdvancedInsight
  - MicroMD has reporting and analytics but doesn't specify advanced business intelligence features

5. Specialty Focus:
  - MicroMD emphasizes customization for various medical specialties
  - AdvancedMD doesn't specifically highlight specialty customization

6. Device Connectivity:
  - MicroMD mentions integration with specific medical devices
  - Not explicitly mentioned for AdvancedMD

7. Image Management and Annotation:
  - Specifically mentioned as a feature for MicroMD
  - Not explicitly mentioned for AdvancedMD

8. ICD-10 Functionality:
  - Highlighted as a key feature in MicroMD
  - Not specifically mentioned for AdvancedMD (though likely included)

9. Pricing Structure:
  - AdvancedMD offers an a la carte model with add-on features
  - MicroMD's pricing structure is not clearly stated in the provided information

Both systems offer comprehensive EHR solutions, but AdvancedMD appears to have a stronger focus on advanced reporting, financial analytics, and dedicated billing services. MicroMD, on the other hand, emphasizes its flexibility, specialty customization, and specific features like device connectivity and image management. The choice between the two would depend on the specific needs of the practice, budget considerations, and the importance of certain features like advanced analytics or specialty-specific tools.

MicroMD Feature Comparison with eClinicalWorks
 

Shared Features:
1. Electronic Health Records (EHR)
2. Practice Management
3. Patient Scheduling
4. Billing and Invoicing
5. Patient Portal
6. E-Prescribing
7. Lab Integration
8. Document Management
9. Reporting and Analytics
10. Telehealth capabilities

Key Differences:

1. Virtual Assistant:
  - eClinicalWorks offers Eva, a virtual assistant available anytime, anywhere, on any device
  - Not mentioned for MicroMD

2. Patient Engagement Tools:
  - eClinicalWorks offers a comprehensive suite including Kiosk Check-in, Online Booking, healow Apps and Trackers, and Messenger Campaigns
  - MicroMD has patient engagement features but doesn't highlight such an extensive suite

3. Population Health Management:
  - eClinicalWorks offers dedicated Population Health solutions including ACO/CIN, Care Planning, CCM, HEDIS, HCC Coding, and PCMH
  - Not explicitly mentioned for MicroMD

4. Revenue Cycle Management (RCM):
  - eClinicalWorks offers both self-service and full-service RCM options
  - MicroMD offers billing features, but doesn't specify a full-service RCM option

5. Interoperability:
  - eClinicalWorks emphasizes free interoperability through CommonWell and Carequality networks
  - Not specifically highlighted for MicroMD

6. ONC Health IT Certification:
  - eClinicalWorks is certified as a 2015 Edition Cures Update product
  - Certification status not mentioned for MicroMD in the provided information

7. Customization:
  - MicroMD emphasizes being "highly customizable"
  - eClinicalWorks doesn't specifically highlight customization, though it likely offers some level of customization

8. In-place Editing:
  - Mentioned as a feature for eClinicalWorks
  - Not explicitly mentioned for MicroMD

Both systems offer comprehensive EHR solutions, but eClinicalWorks appears to have a broader range of integrated features, particularly in patient engagement and population health management. eClinicalWorks also emphasizes its interoperability and certification status. MicroMD, while offering core EHR functionalities, highlights its simplicity and customizability. The choice between the two would depend on the specific needs of the practice, such as the importance of advanced patient engagement tools, population health management, or the level of customization required.


MicroMD Feature Comparison with AthenaHealth

Based on the information provided about MicroMD and AthenaHealth, here's a comparison of their key features:

Shared Features:
1. Electronic Health Records (EHR)
2. Practice Management
3. Patient Scheduling
4. Billing and Invoicing
5. Patient Portal
6. E-Prescribing
7. Lab Integration
8. Document Management
9. Reporting and Analytics
10. Appointment Reminders
11. Clinical Workflow Management
12. Customizable Templates
13. Insurance Eligibility Verification
14. Patient Check-In
15. Mobile Access
16. Secure Messaging
17. Compliance Tracking
18. Telehealth Integration

Key Differences:

1. Cloud-Based Architecture:
  - AthenaHealth emphasizes its fully cloud-based solution
  - MicroMD offers both cloud-based and server-based options

2. Network Insights:
  - AthenaHealth leverages data from its large network of providers to offer benchmarking and performance insights
  - Not explicitly mentioned for MicroMD

3. Revenue Cycle Management (RCM):
  - AthenaHealth offers comprehensive RCM services with dedicated staff
  - MicroMD has billing features but doesn't specify full-service RCM

4. Interoperability:
  - AthenaHealth emphasizes its interoperability capabilities and data exchange
  - MicroMD mentions interoperability but doesn't highlight it as extensively

5. Mobile App:
  - AthenaHealth offers a dedicated mobile app (AthenaOne) for clinical work
  - MicroMD offers mobile access but doesn't specify a dedicated app

6. Population Health Management:
  - AthenaHealth offers population health management tools
  - Not explicitly mentioned for MicroMD

7. Image Management:
  - MicroMD specifically mentions image management capabilities
  - Not highlighted as a key feature for AthenaHealth

8. Inventory Management:
  - Mentioned as a feature for MicroMD
  - Not explicitly listed for AthenaHealth

9. Pricing Structure:
  - AthenaHealth's pricing starts at $140 per month
  - MicroMD's pricing structure is not clearly stated in the provided information

Both systems offer comprehensive EHR solutions, but AthenaHealth appears to have a stronger focus on cloud-based services, network insights, and advanced RCM capabilities. MicroMD emphasizes its flexibility and customization options, making it suitable for various medical specialties and practice sizes. The choice between the two would depend on the specific needs of the practice, budget considerations, and the importance of features like advanced analytics or specialty-specific tools.