Top 10 Mettl Alternatives

Mettl is a well-known choice for proctoring, online assessments, and scalable lateral or campus hiring. It offsets personality, aptitude, and skill testing with workflows that are configurable. However, some teams look around for alternatives when they require something easier with simple authoring, compatible controls to prevent cheating, or strong HRIS and ATS integrations. Apart from that, some may reconsider on the basis of their need for role-specific simulations, guardrails that are US-compliant, or quicker time to value.

We have discussed ten strong Mettl alternatives below. For every software, you can discover where it excels, its pros and cons to set expectations, and a cost breakdown so you can make a quick and optimized decision.

TL;DR: What is the best alternative to Mettl? TestGorilla is an excellent initial choice when it comes to non-technical and mixed agency recruiting. It provides a big test library, speedy implementation, and viable anti-cheat features that suit SMB teams to mid-market teams.

Our Top 10 Mettl Alternatives Recommendations

1. TestGorilla

Best For: Non-technical, high-variance roles

Overall Rating: 4.5

Free Test/Trial: N/A

TestGorilla provides you with an extensive test library and role templates to enable small and medium-sized businesses (SMB) and mid-market teams to build assessments in minutes. The software supports mobile candidates and is compatible with most popular applicant tracking system (ATS) tools.

It has a built-in anti-cheat monitor, such as full-screen tracking and IP flags, that assist you in reviewing the unusual candidates before making decisions. You are able to include video questions to get a richer signal and provide clear and manager-friendly reports.

TestGorilla, unlike Mettl, specializes in the fast deployment of non-technical positions, which allows HR departments to deploy assessments without extensive customization.

Migration Tip: Export Mettl sections, map them to TestGorilla tests, and re-benchmark cut scores with a pilot run.

What Are The Pros And Cons Of TestGorilla?

How Much Does It Cost?

The software offers the following pricing plans:

• Free - $0
• Core - $142/month (Billed annually)
• Plus - Custom pricing

Disclaimer: The pricing is subject to change.

2. Sajoki

Best For: AI-driven soft skills and role-specific personality testing

Overall Rating: N/A

Free Test/Trial: Free Demo Test Available

Sajoki is focused on AI-assisted personality and soft-skills screening, which is profession-based. You take a position, receive an industry-specific soft-skills test, and profiles that highlight fit and strengths. This is appropriate in teams that value rapid role alignment as opposed to an enormous generalist catalog.

It facilitates various sizes of organizations and offers assistance with implementation. Sajoki would be a good option compared to the more general test mix of Mettl when you want to have soft-skills signals early in the funnel.

Migration Tip: Export current personality findings, target role traits, and test Sajoki profile recommendations on a small scale first and then expand.

What Are The Pros And Cons Of Sajoki?

How Much Does It Cost?

The following are two of the pricing modules that the software offers:

General Plans:

• Basic Plan - $40/test
• Individuals Or Small Companies - $35/test
• General Plan For Advanced Users - $30/test

Company Plans:

• Starter Plan - $25/test
• Growth Plan - $20/test
• Company Plus - $15/test
• SaaS For Companies And Labeling - Custom pricing

Disclaimer: The pricing is subject to change.

3. Traitify

Best For: 90-second, visual-based assessment

Overall Rating: N/A

Free Test/Trial: Free Assessment Available

Paradox Traitify is a patented, image-based personality test that takes an average of 90 seconds to complete. Its graphical presentation makes it a very good option in high-volume hiring in hourly, campus, and service jobs where early turnover is the biggest threat.

The recruiters get instant and easy-to-read profiles that may pass through automated screening procedures. Traitify is more suitable than Mettl when you require the quickest insights into personality. Nevertheless, it is often supplemented by skills or job simulations by many teams to have a more complete assessment.

Migration Tip: Pilot Traitify and your existing Mettl tests in 30 days. Compare the completion rate and quality of candidates and set your requirements to pass at a speed that fits with quality.

What Are The Pros And Cons Of Traitify?

How Much Does It Cost?

The software offers straightforward pricing designed to keep costs predictable for users:

• Basic - $20/year

Disclaimer: The pricing has been sourced from third-party websites and is subject to change.

4. EightFold AI

Best For: Talent intelligence and skills interference

Overall Rating: N/A

Free Test/Trial: N/A

Eightfold.ai is a talent intelligence system that employs a global talent database and skills graph to improve matching and internal mobility, as well as candidate screening. It is also connected to the enterprise ATS and HR systems and collaborates with external assessment tools via its ecosystem.

In contrast to Mettl, which is less about assessment and more about proctoring, Eightfold AI is more about talent intelligence that is based on skills. It assists enterprises in transcending the test delivery activity through mapping workforce capabilities, enhancing internal mobility, as well as providing a long-term perspective of talent growth. Although Mettl is simpler when it comes to test creation, Eightfold AI is a better strategic value provider to any enterprise with a skills-first hiring program.

Migration Tip: Begin with recruiting and matching externally. When taxonomies and integrations are stable, then go to internal mobility.

What Are The Pros And Cons Of EightFold AI?

How Much Does It Cost?

Pricing is user-based and scales with organization size. The plan includes Basic, which starts from $10.

Disclaimer: The pricing has been sourced from third-party websites and is subject to change.

5. Harver

Best For: High-volume hourly hiring

Overall Rating: 5.0

Free Test/Trial: N/A

Harver provides predictive evaluations that are correlated to job descriptions and real job previews that create an expectation of hourly jobs. It is aimed at BPO, contact center, retail, and logistics operations where speed and scale are important.  

Its two-way matching and situational judgment content are useful in minimizing the risks of mis-hiring and early turnover.

Harver is a realistic Mettl substitute when your funnel is skewed towards frontline recruitment and you require volume-oriented templates and analytics.

Migration Tip: At one location or region, run a parallel pilot and compare the no-show rates and 90-day retention rates before full roll-out.

What Are The Pros And Cons Of Harver?

How Much Does It Cost?

The platform offers an annual subscription model tailored to large organizations:

• Basic - $5,000/year

Disclaimer: The pricing has been sourced from third-party websites and is subject to change.

6. HireVue

Best For: Video interviewing and assessments in one

Overall Rating: N/A

Free Test/Trial: N/A

HireVue is a combination of on-demand and live video interviewing with assessments, interview guides, automated routing, and shareable recording. It allows teams to speed up campus and entry-level recruiting and maintain evaluation consistency with the help of rubrics and standardized questions.

When you want a single flow of interview and evaluation for every candidate, this is an attractive Mettl alternative that consolidates the screening process and minimizes hand-offs. You can authenticate devices and bandwidth in your population.

Migration Tip: Before going live with migration, prepare standard question packs and raters to ensure consistency in scoring across cohorts.

What Are The Pros And Cons Of HireVue?

How Much Does It Cost?

HireVue offers the following custom pricing plans based on the needs of organizations.

• Essential
• Enterprise
• Premium

Disclaimer: The pricing is subject to change.

7. iMocha

Best For: Skills assessment and skills intelligence

Overall Rating: N/A

Free Test/Trial: 14-Day Free Trial

iMocha offers a large selection of skills tests in 3,000+ skills assessments in technical and non-technical positions. It is also available with AI-based proctoring, sophisticated question creation, and connections with significant Human Capital Management (HCM) and ATS solutions.

In contrast to Mettl, iMocha focuses on hiring and continuous upskilling on the same plane. This would be more applicable in organizations that are interested in monitoring employee development, other than at the time of recruitment. Its advanced reporting functionalities and BI integrations also provide the HR teams with more visibility on the skills data than Mettl.

Migration Tip: Catalog the current tests, discard redundant ones, and map the rest to your skills taxonomy.

What Are The Pros And Cons Of iMocha?

How Much Does It Cost?

IMocha offers the following plans, scaled by usage and features.

• Basic - $999/year
• Pro - $3,199/year
• Enterprise – Custom Pricing

Disclaimer: The pricing is subject to change.

8. Vervoe

Best For: AI-powered job simulations

Overall Rating: N/A

Free Test/Trial: 7-Day Free Trial

Vervoe focuses on practical activities in which the candidates perform role-specific tasks followed by AI grading and ranking. Hence, reviewers are encouraged to work with the top submissions.

It is a better indicator of job readiness than resumes and is effective in sales, support, content, and operations positions.

Vervoe is an excellent option in comparison with the traditional test formats designed by Mettl; it allows teams to observe the practical results and portfolios and can also plan for authoring time and reviewer capacity.

Migration Tip: Port your two or three best hiring scenarios initially and have deadline periods to reduce drop-off.

What Are The Pros And Cons Of Vervoe?

How Much Does It Cost?

Vervoe offers a custom pricing model with plans created for different hiring needs.

• Free
• Pay As You Go
• Custom

Disclaimer: The pricing is subject to change.

9. WeCP

Best For: Technical screening with proctoring

Overall Rating: N/A

Free Test/Trial: Free Test(s) Available During Free Trial

WeCP focuses on technical recruiting and puts strong emphasis on coding tests, live pair-programming interviews, and a massive role-based question bank. Its AI-driven proctoring named Sherlock identifies plagiarism, behavioral aberrations, and cheating activities with real-time monitoring directions. The platform is also connected to large ATS systems to facilitate workflow.

WeCP has more coding-based assessments and collaborative interview functions as compared to Mettl. Whereas Mettl is an overview of more general types of tests, WeCP is engineering-specific, where accuracy and fidelity of the coding environment are extremely important.

Migration Tip: Validate pass scores through a pilot across front-end, back-end, and quality assurance (QA) positions.

What Are The Pros And Cons Of WeCP?

How Much Does It Cost?

With its tiered pricing plans, WeCP provides options for both small teams and enterprises.

• Premium Plan- $240/month
• Enterprise Plan – Custom Pricing

Disclaimer: The pricing is subject to change.

10. Talview

Best For: End-to-end automation with video interviews and assessments

Overall Rating: N/A

Free Test/Trial: N/A

Talview is a combined skill test engine, remote proctoring, and video interviewing platform that handles a single workflow with combined talent tests and hiring. It assists companies in streamlining the recruiting process from screening to selection based on AI-based evaluations, automated scheduling, and mobile compatibility.

Talview stresses faster hiring processes with less manual steps compared to Mettl. It may be particularly applicable to businesses and educational institutions that require remote recruitment and online testing services both at scale.

What Are The Pros And Cons Of Talview?

How Much Does It Cost?

Talview offers customizable pricing based on the chosen solution, product package, and number of hires. Costs vary by organization size and hiring needs, ensuring flexibility and scalability for different users.

How We Chose Our Mettl Alternatives?

We used a structured evaluation framework to review each platform. The goal was to find alternatives that solve Mettl’s gaps in coverage, integrity, and candidate experience.

What Buyer Problems Did We Prioritize?

Our attention was directed towards teams that require quicker screening procedures, better reporting to the hiring managers, and integrity controls that are reliable. We also examined applications of use cases where organizations desire job simulation, skill intelligence, or integrated video interviewing as opposed to test delivery. Our shortlists prefer those platforms that reduce the time to shortlist and minimize candidate drop-off on mobile.

Which Assessment Coverage Did We Require?

All the alternatives were to have believable coverage in at least one of these areas: cognitive, personality, job skills, coding, or simulations. We compared role template depth, ready-made test breadth, and the ability to author custom items without heavy setup.

How Did We Evaluate Integrity And Fairness?

We ensured anti-cheat options like identity checks, webcam or session monitoring, browser or full-screen, and plagiarism or AI-use as applicable. We preferred the tools that promote structured scoring that uses rubrics and provide auditability to review compliance.

What Did We Look For In Candidate Experience?

We put priority on mobile readiness, conspicuous time anticipations, and reachable flows. We put priority on mobile preparedness, conspicuous time anticipations, and reachable flows. In platforms that ensure assessments are succinct, progress is reported, and schedules can be changed, the ranking was high. Completion rates and drop-offs are the main determinants of funnel health.

How Important Were Integrations And Security?

We evaluated native connections with popular ATS and human resource information system (HRIS) systems, SSO/SCIM, and BI tool export solutions. Security posture mattered. We observed the presence of SOC 2 or ISO frameworks, data retention controls, and administrative permissions.

How Did Pricing And Time To Value Influence Rankings?

We focused on the price transparency and the possibility of initially having a small pilot. Clear packaging, predictable volumes, and rapid implementation were considered a plus. Quote-only tools were added when they provided unique functionality to particular uses.

What Validation Steps Did We Recommend?

In the case of every tool, we described a pilot approach. Export new outcomes, align competencies to the new catalog, adjust pass scores, and raters’ calibration. Our set of vendors preferred those that assist in structured pilots and give practical advice to migrate Mettl to.

Selecting The Best Mettl Alternative

The most suitable Mettl alternative will be based on your role mix, volume of hiring, and process maturity. In the case of general non-technical recruiting, TestGorilla provides speed and a huge collection of libraries.

Harver or Traitify can be used in high-volume hourly positions in order to decrease drop-off. Vervoe simulations can be used to display real skills, whereas at WeCP is convenient for coding and technical hiring. 

Eightfold AI also features long-term skill visibility, and HireVue is a video interview combined with assessment. In niche cases requiring special simulations, consider Sajoki and establish the scope early enough to ensure that authoring and integrations are on time.

Use-case-based analysis is a meticulous process that will help you get the next evaluation platform aligned with the aspirations of your team. Using the above options, you will have an option of a tool that eases the screening process, aids in making fair and valid decisions, and scales with your talent strategy.

Conduct a pilot and map Mettl tests to the new platform, and compare the completion rates and results, then gradually roll out in order to make sure that it meets the hiring targets.