Top 10 OPUS EHR Alternatives

OPUS EHR is one of the leading EHR solutions for the behavioral health practice that provides tools to manage, schedule and bill patients. But while the features of one EHR may not suit the needs of healthcare practices attempting to obtain something different and broader, they are looking for other EHRs. Below are the top 10 OPUS EHR competitors.  

Epic EMR  

Epic EMR is one of the most popular in the world and it is most commonly used in big health care organizations. One of the major advantages of Epic is that it is very customizable, integrating well with a wide range of specialties which include behavioral health. Aptly designed for practices that give importance to patient engagement and continuity, it features the MyChart patient portal, and guaranteed ledger integration.  

Comparison with OPUS EHR 

What is more, by contrast to OPUS EHR which is designed for use in behavioral health only, Epic EMR is appropriate for any type of healthcare organization, be it a hospital or a multi-specialty practice. Large medical centers that expect the exchange of massive volumes of patient data or want to connect with other healthcare organizations would be best served by Epic since it easily shares information and is highly interoperable.  

Cerner  

It is one of the most essential EHR platforms focusing on data analysis and briefing a strong infrastructure. There are tools for patient engagement, video and remote consultations, and population healthcare management that can be of use to both large and small facilities. Cerner can interface with other systems which organic touching a crucial factor to healthcare setups that require seamless sharing of information across networks.  

Comparison with OPUS EHR

With its strength of being designed for behavioral health, OPUS EHR can seamlessly work with Cerner, which, with its wider data analytics and population health armamentarium, is more suitable for complex healthcare organizations. It provides the coverage needed by the larger practices that require richer, interoperable data and analytics. 

Allscripts  

Allscripts is an open EHR that can be customized and is implemented in various specialties. It covers patient care, billing, and telemedicine, and is particularly well known for its strong rep with regards to the information exchange as well as the analysis. Customization of the platform is thus very easy meaning that practices can easily customize it to meet their individual needs.  

Comparison with OPUS EHR

OPUS EHR is more suitable to behavioral health care as compared to Allscripts which has facilities for several types of practices. Another strength of Allscripts is that where practices need customization, they are able to make changes to templates and other derived clinical and operational workflows.  

eClinicalWorks  

eClinicalWorks has tools for patient scheduling, telemedicine, and tools for Population health management within the Practice Management module. Recognized for its patient interface solutions that can be easily implemented, it is very flexible and can be aligned to specialty requirements, thus fitting most specialties regardless of size.  

Comparison with OPUS EHR

While OPUS EHR is specifically designed for use in the behavioral health field, there are many other specialties that are served by eClinicalWorks EHR software solution This is why practices that may be interested in a more broad-based EHR solution should consider eClinicalWorks which has good population health and patient engagement tools.  

Athenahealth  

Athena is a cloud-based electronic health record solution that is specifically strong with billing and revenue management. Interoperability, patient engagement, and telehealth are some of the tools it has making it attractive to practices that need managerial oversight tools. Athenahealth has a large number of reports which makes it a great fit for data-orientated healthcare services.  

Comparison with OPUS EHR 

OPUS EHR targets the behavioral health realms of practice, but Athenahealth has its highest values for revenue cycle and telemedicine realms. Athenahealth is more appropriate for operations that require financial management and patient consulting. 

Kareo  

Kareo is a popular EHR solution designed for smaller practices, providing essential tools for scheduling, billing, and telehealth. Its user-friendly interface and intuitive workflows make it a top choice for independent and smaller clinics. Additionally, Kareo offers patient engagement features to enhance communication. 

Comparison with OPUS EHR

Kareo is highly flexible for small practices across various specialties, while OPUS EHR focuses specifically on behavioral health. The affordability and ease of use of Kareo make it an excellent option for small practices seeking an all-in-one solution. 

Meditech  

Meditech is a widely used EHR platform in hospital environments, recognized for its capability to manage complex healthcare data and workflows. Its strong interoperability with other systems makes it particularly beneficial for facilities within integrated health networks. Meditech also offers tools for patient engagement and population health management. 

Comparison with OPUS EHR

Meditech’s scalability and interoperability are ideal for hospitals, whereas OPUS EHR is tailored for behavioral health practices. Facilities that require an EHR system with robust data-sharing features will find Meditech to be a compelling choice. 

AdvancedMD  

AdvancedMD is a comprehensive EHR and practice management platform, known for its extensive features in scheduling, billing, and telemedicine. It is particularly well-suited for medium to large practices and offers customizable templates to accommodate various specialties. AdvancedMD also provides powerful reporting and analytics tools. 

Comparison with OPUS EHR

AdvancedMD’s diverse features cater to a wide range of specialties, while OPUS EHR is specifically designed for behavioral health. Practices seeking detailed reporting and customization may lean towards AdvancedMD for its broader applicability. 

DrChrono  

DrChrono is a cloud-based EHR solution recognized for its customization capabilities and user-friendly mobile interface. It offers tools for scheduling, patient documentation, and billing, along with additional telehealth functionalities. DrChrono is designed to meet the needs of modern healthcare practices. 

Comparison with OPUS EHR

When comparing with OPUS EHR, it's important to note that while OPUS EHR focuses on behavioral health, DrChrono provides a wider range of mobile-friendly tools for practices seeking flexibility. Its robust mobile features make DrChrono a great option for clinicians operating in multiple locations. 

Practice Fusion 

Practice Fusion is a cloud-based EHR solution aimed at small to medium-sized practices. It is recognized for its simplicity and user-friendliness, offering essential tools for scheduling, billing, and patient documentation. Additionally, Practice Fusion is budget-friendly, making it a favored choice among independent practices. 

Comparison with OPUS EHR

In comparison to OPUS EHR, Practice Fusion caters to various specialties with its straightforward, user-friendly interface, which is particularly appealing to smaller practices. While OPUS EHR is specifically designed for behavioral health, the affordability and basic functionality of Practice Fusion make it an attractive alternative for general practices in need of essential EHR features.